It's Perfect thanks
2011/3/11 "Martin v. Löwis" :
>
>> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/distribute/docs, with a big link on the
>> top of http://pypi.python.org/pypi/distribute to go there.
>
> I have now added a link at the top. Such a link already was there at
> the bottom, but now it's duplicated at
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/distribute/docs, with a big link on the
top of http://pypi.python.org/pypi/distribute to go there.
I have now added a link at the top. Such a link already was there at
the bottom, but now it's duplicated at the top also. Not sure whether
it's big enough :-)
Regards
Am 07.03.2011 11:18, schrieb Éric Araujo:
Le 06/03/2011 22:17, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit :
As for changing the style: please submit a html file to replace what is
there (I refuse to do any styling .
Do you mean you don’t want to work on styling personally or that you
object to someone proposin
Le 06/03/2011 22:17, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit :
> As for changing the style: please submit a html file to replace what is
> there (I refuse to do any styling .
Do you mean you don’t want to work on styling personally or that you
object to someone proposing a patch adding styling? It it’s the lat
2011/3/6 "Martin v. Löwis"
> What particular clause strikes you as particularly unfriendly?
>>> Please understand that it may sound harsh, but is necessary - better
>>> be safe than sorry.
>>>
>>
>> Nothing wrong about the warning itself, but about landing on a plain
>> condensed text page.
>> I
As for a big link: if you think your page should have one, you are free
to make it yourself already.
Sure but,
1/ I have never asked for the "Downloads ↓" link either, but the UI
did add it, and it's really more ergonomic.
2/ I have never asked for "Latest Version: 0.6.14" on this page : hit
t
2011/3/6 Tarek Ziadé :
...
> and you also say for 2/ "if you think your page should have links to
s/ you also / you could have also /
(not clear otherwise)
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/
2011/3/6 "Martin v. Löwis" :
>>> What particular clause strikes you as particularly unfriendly?
>>> Please understand that it may sound harsh, but is necessary - better
>>> be safe than sorry.
>>
>> Nothing wrong about the warning itself, but about landing on a plain
>> condensed text page.
>> I th
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 22:05, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> I guess either http://pypi.python.org/pypi/distribute/docs or
>> http://pypi.python.org/docs/distribute would be acceptable.
>
> The former won't work - it tries to get a version labeled "docs"
> from "distribute". As for the latter, see
>
What particular clause strikes you as particularly unfriendly?
Please understand that it may sound harsh, but is necessary - better
be safe than sorry.
Nothing wrong about the warning itself, but about landing on a plain
condensed text page.
I think we should make it a html page. And maybe displ
2011/3/6 Tarek Ziadé
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:42 PM, "Martin v. Löwis"
> wrote:
> >> One thing I find weird is the root page of packages.python.org -- This
> >> warning is not super user friendly.
> >
> > What particular clause strikes you as particularly unfriendly?
> > Please understand that
I guess either http://pypi.python.org/pypi/distribute/docs or
http://pypi.python.org/docs/distribute would be acceptable.
The former won't work - it tries to get a version labeled "docs"
from "distribute". As for the latter, see
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/2008-August/001723.ht
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:42 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> One thing I find weird is the root page of packages.python.org -- This
>> warning is not super user friendly.
>
> What particular clause strikes you as particularly unfriendly?
> Please understand that it may sound harsh, but is necessary
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:53 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I think it's less about the content and more about the form. I think
>> this warning belongs in a little `legal` section at the bottom, not as
>> the first thing that a visitor sees.
>>
>
> Are we talking about the same document? On
>
> h
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 21:42, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> One thing I find weird is the root page of packages.python.org -- This
>> warning is not super user friendly.
>
> What particular clause strikes you as particularly unfriendly?
It's rather the lack of design and just a link that seems a bi
I think it's less about the content and more about the form. I think
this warning belongs in a little `legal` section at the bottom, not as
the first thing that a visitor sees.
Are we talking about the same document? On
http://packages.python.org/
the warning *is* in the bottom of the page (no
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:42 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> One thing I find weird is the root page of packages.python.org -- This
>> warning is not super user friendly.
>>
>
> What particular clause strikes you as particularly unfriendly?
> Please understand that it may sound harsh, but is necess
One thing I find weird is the root page of packages.python.org -- This
warning is not super user friendly.
What particular clause strikes you as particularly unfriendly?
Please understand that it may sound harsh, but is necessary - better
be safe than sorry.
That said, maybe projects documenta
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 20:49, cool-RR wrote:
>> Speaking of names, I would rename PyPI to packages.python.org, maybe move
>> the existing documentation center to docs.python.org, and then move the docs
>> of Python itself to a `/python` fol
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 20:49, cool-RR wrote:
> > Speaking of names, I would rename PyPI to packages.python.org, maybe
> move
> > the existing documentation center to docs.python.org, and then move the
> docs
> > of Python itself to a `/py
20 matches
Mail list logo
