Re: [Distutils] pipenv use cases

On 17 January 2018 at 12:51, Nick Coghlan wrote: > I think tox provides a good precedent for what's needed when it comes > to effectively targeting multiple environments: you want a venv per > target environment per project, not just a venv per project. After double-checking

Re: [Distutils] PEP 566 - metadata 1.3 changes

On 18 January 2018 at 10:22, Dustin Ingram wrote: >> Metadata 1.3 vs Metadata 2.0 > > I agree with Nick here that since this version is backwards-compatible, that > it > should remain Metadata 1.3. > > In addition, I think we should avoid overloading the already-in-use "2.0" >

Re: [Distutils] PEP 566 - metadata 1.3 changes

Hi all, Thanks very much for all your suggestions and feedback. I want to take a moment to summarize & respond to some outstanding issues from this thread & previous threads. [0][1][2] First, I'd like to reiterate that the goal of this PEP is to: 1. Define the Core Metadata document as the