Re: [Distutils] 400 Client Error: Binary wheel for an unsupported platform

2015-07-07 Thread Donald Stufft
On July 7, 2015 at 10:22:55 AM, Nick Coghlan (ncogh...@gmail.com) wrote: On 8 July 2015 at 00:07, Antoine Pitrou wrote: On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 23:53:59 +1000 Nick Coghlan wrote: Unfortunately, the compatibility tagging for Linux wheels is currently so thoroughly inadequate that even in

Re: [Distutils] 400 Client Error: Binary wheel for an unsupported platform

2015-07-07 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 11:02:40 -0400 Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote: In my mind, the biggest reason to not just open up the ability to upload even generic linux wheels right now is the lack of a safe-ish default. I think if we added a few things: * Default to per platform tags (e.g.

Re: [Distutils] 400 Client Error: Binary wheel for an unsupported platform

2015-07-07 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/06/2015 02:18 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 19:03:19 +0100 Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 July 2015 at 17:24, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote: (yes, the version number is off - but that's besides the

Re: [Distutils] Phantom release/file and now can't upload

2015-07-07 Thread James Bennett
The 1.1 release exists, but PyPI thinks -- at least when it shows me the package-owner interface -- that there are no files for that release. Here's a screenshot of what I see: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/408510/django-contact-form-n-file.png Checked the 1.0 release just in case it went

Re: [Distutils] Phantom release/file and now can't upload

2015-07-07 Thread Richard Jones
This is very strange - perhaps there's a caching issue or something, but there's a file present on that release when I look now :/ On 7 July 2015 at 15:09, James Bennett ubernost...@gmail.com wrote: Earlier tonight I was trying to upload a new version (1.1) of

[Distutils] ANN: distlib 0.2.1 released on PyPI

2015-07-07 Thread Vinay Sajip
I've just released version 0.2.1 of distlib on PyPI [1]. For newcomers, distlib is a library of packaging functionality which is intended to be usable as the basis for third-party packaging tools. The main changes in this release are as follows:     Fixed issue #58: Return a Distribution

Re: [Distutils] 400 Client Error: Binary wheel for an unsupported platform

2015-07-07 Thread David Cournapeau
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote: On July 7, 2015 at 10:22:55 AM, Nick Coghlan (ncogh...@gmail.com) wrote: On 8 July 2015 at 00:07, Antoine Pitrou wrote: On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 23:53:59 +1000 Nick Coghlan wrote: Unfortunately, the compatibility tagging

Re: [Distutils] Phantom release/file and now can't upload

2015-07-07 Thread Richard Jones
Ah, sorry, I misunderstood. I believe I've removed the offending entry from the database that's blocking you uploading. Please try again. Richard On 8 July 2015 at 09:28, James Bennett ubernost...@gmail.com wrote: The 1.1 release exists, but PyPI thinks -- at least when it shows me the

Re: [Distutils] 400 Client Error: Binary wheel for an unsupported platform

2015-07-07 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 8 July 2015 at 00:07, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote: On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 23:53:59 +1000 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately, the compatibility tagging for Linux wheels is currently so thoroughly inadequate that even in tightly controlled environments having a

Re: [Distutils] 400 Client Error: Binary wheel for an unsupported platform

2015-07-07 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 23:53:59 +1000 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 July 2015 at 07:46, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote: On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 22:34:38 +0100 Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 July 2015 at 19:18, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote: What if

Re: [Distutils] 400 Client Error: Binary wheel for an unsupported platform

2015-07-07 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 7 July 2015 at 07:46, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote: On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 22:34:38 +0100 Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 July 2015 at 19:18, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote: What if packagers take care of working around the issue? (for example by building on