[Distutils] Re: org-mode README file formats

If warehouse punted to a tool like pandoc already, I would see no problem with adding support for everything that pandoc supported (can you imagine – reademe.docx?), but just skimming the requirements file, they are pulling in docutils and mistune, which means they have written warehouse to

[Distutils] Re: Packaging/Warehouse sprint at PyCon 2018

Reminder: it's free to attend and participate in the PyCon development sprints (you don't need a Talks and Events PyCon registration to come to the sprints). If you live anywhere nearish Cleveland, even if you couldn't make it to the talks days, consider joining us at least for Monday May 14th,

[Distutils] Re: org-mode README file formats

On Tue, May 8, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > If it is an Emacs thing then I would vote "no" since that's very editor- > specific and I suspect trying to support every plaintext file format > is never-ending. Currently the metadata spec defines the permitted mimetypes. Maybe we should

[Distutils] Re: proposing Python package index upload API spec (potential PEP)

I like this practice of writing specifications to better document interfaces that already exist. However, in this case I wonder if it would be better to spend the time defining a new, simpler API instead? I think we're currently in a position where most tools could use a new upload API

[Distutils] Re: org-mode README file formats

On 8 May 2018 at 15:00, Diane Trout wrote: > On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 16:44 +, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > > On Mon, 7 May 2018 at 16:54 Diane Trout wrote: > > Hi, > > I was building a package where I had a README.org file, which > setuptools couldn't find. > > It

[Distutils] Re: Python 3.7 binary wheels

On Tue, May 8, 2018, 20:59 Lele Gaifax wrote: > Hi all, > > Python 3.7 is steadily approaching its final release and I start wondering > > a) when will be the right time to start uploading 3.7 binary wheels on > PyPI? > The ABI was frozen at 3.7b3 (we're currently at b4),

[Distutils] Re: Python 3.7 binary wheels

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Steve Dower wrote: > On 08May2018 2134, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> for 3.6 there was a last minute problem >> with the Windows ABI that only got discovered during the rc period. But >> if you're willing to keep an ear out for that sort of

[Distutils] Re: Python 3.7 binary wheels

On 08May2018 2134, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > for 3.6 there was a last minute problem > with the Windows ABI that only got discovered during the rc period. But > if you're willing to keep an ear out for that sort of thing, go wild. I thought this was 3.5 (or maybe I've blanked out the more recent

[Distutils] Python 3.7 binary wheels

Hi all, Python 3.7 is steadily approaching its final release and I start wondering a) when will be the right time to start uploading 3.7 binary wheels on PyPI? b) if/when manylinux2010 happens, does that mean that I should build both manylinux1 and manylinux2010 variants? Thank you in

[Distutils] Re: org-mode README file formats

On Mon, 7 May 2018 at 16:54 Diane Trout wrote: > Hi, > > I was building a package where I had a README.org file, which > setuptools couldn't find. > > It listed .md as a valid format, so I was wondering if org-mode was > sufficiently plain text to be added to the list of accepted

[Distutils] Re: org-mode README file formats

On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 16:44 +, Brett Cannon wrote: > On Mon, 7 May 2018 at 16:54 Diane Trout wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I was building a package where I had a README.org file, which > > > > setuptools couldn't find. > > > > > > > > It listed .md as a valid format,

[Distutils] proposing Python package index upload API spec (potential PEP)

As a new Twine maintainer I've been running into questions like: * Now that Warehouse doesn't use "register" anymore, can we deprecate it from distutils, setuptools, and twine? Are any other package indexes or upload tools using it? https://github.com/pypa/twine/issues/311 * It would be nice if