Hey Uros,
Just two weeks ago, I've been trying to make my own generic history
implementation, but then decided for lack of time, to just make a
one-shot implementation and wait for someone else to write a clean
implementation. Awesome you're already working on it.
To help you find an optimal des
On 28-Jun-06, at 4:58 AM, Derek Anderson wrote:
>
> to avoid flooding the list, you can send them directly to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] unless you think the list needs a discussion
> regarding how an evolution should be made, of course.
better to keep it on list
--
regards
kg
http://lawgon.livejo
Hello,
I've been checking the Row-Level perms project, and I'm interested in
helping in somehow.
Please, let me know how I can help. BTW, I'm a developer, I'm not good
at design :-)
Cheers,
João Marcus
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been using Django for a project, and one thing I have sorely
> missed is having an ifless and ifgreater template tag. Other internal
> projects have had similar problems, and made at best hacks to work
> around this missing feature. I understand however that there
subject line says it all - i want your models! :)
if it's obvious what the change is with a comment, that's fine. if not,
before and after versions would be appreciated. i'd like everything
from the mundane to the esoteric.
to avoid flooding the list, you can send them directly to
[EMAIL PROT
Hey,
I've been using Django for a project, and one thing I have sorely
missed is having an ifless and ifgreater template tag. Other internal
projects have had similar problems, and made at best hacks to work
around this missing feature. I understand however that there is some
hesitance to add mor
On 6/27/06, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/27/06, toth anna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > You should be able to get the behavior you want by
> > overriding the
> > > save() method on your models.
> >
> > Is there any usable examples somewhere
On 6/27/06, toth anna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You should be able to get the behavior you want by
> overriding the
> > save() method on your models.
>
> Is there any usable examples somewhere for me?
Here's the general idea:
http://www.djangoproject.com/d
Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You should be able to get the behavior you want by
overriding the
> save() method on your models.
Is there any usable examples somewhere for me?
Anna
_
Teljes körű pénzügyi ügyintézés
Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This question is best asked on django-users; I'm
redirecting this
> thread there.
Sorry for that, i have to subscribe there...
Anna.
_
Teljes körű pénzügyi ügyintézés és hite
On 6/27/06, toth anna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there any (elegant) opportunity for a "container level
> logic". For example, there can be only 5 from a specific
> type of item, and inserting a new, we have to delete oldest
> object.
> Or when saving an object, container "splits" it, and c
On Jun 27, 2006, at 9:58 AM, toth anna wrote:
> I'm working on my thesis in our academy (i have to
> implement, too).
> Searching for an enviroment, i found django, and it looks
> very nice.
> After reading tutorial, i have some questions (and more to
> come...:) before i fall in love with it.
>
>
Hi all!
I'm working on my thesis in our academy (i have to
implement, too).
Searching for an enviroment, i found django, and it looks
very nice.
After reading tutorial, i have some questions (and more to
come...:) before i fall in love with it.
Is there any (elegant) opportunity for a "containe
Jacob,
I sent you an email about getting commit access to the branch a couple
of days ago. Did you get it, or should I resend?
Thanks,
JP
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
On 6/26/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> p = Person.objects.create(...)
> >>
> >> Which is kinda orthogonal to ``get_or_create``.
> >
> > +1 - This is more appealing to me. As well as being orthogonal to
> > get_or_create, it parallels the behaviour of the m2o/m2m desc
15 matches
Mail list logo
