Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> The first option sounds better to me, too. Are you willing to code up a patch?
OK. I'll post a follow-up here with the ticket number in a day or two.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Feb 5, 5:37 pm, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 2a. WSGI support / compatibility -> so WSGI middleware and WSGI apps
> > could be integrated with the framework (for example AuthKit with
> > openID, pocoo)
>
> Django is WSGI compliant. You can use WSGI m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1. Full if support - if/elif/else with python access - It could be
> done in the view but making a loop in view and second one in template
> isn't a nice solution.
I bet you can find such or similar discussion in the archives of this
list or django-users. In short -- n
On 2/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Full if support - if/elif/else with python access - It could be
> done in the view but making a loop in view and second one in template
> isn't a nice solution.
As far as I know, support for arbitrary Python expressions in
templates (wh
On 2/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I''ve been using Django some time, I've also looked on Pylons and it's
> friends :) Django is a nice framework but there are few things I would
> want to see in the framework
>
> 1. Full if support - if/elif/else with python access - It c
I''ve been using Django some time, I've also looked on Pylons and it's
friends :) Django is a nice framework but there are few things I would
want to see in the framework
1. Full if support - if/elif/else with python access - It could be
done in the view but making a loop in view and second one i
Hi all.
I agree with Benjamin completely.
I hate Identity Map and synchronization approach.
They break database logic like trigger or view.
2007/2/5, Benjamin Slavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I've also given this some consideration -- I haven't found any
> information on this either.
>
> It would
Remove all files up to 3581-
streaming_uploads_and_uploadprogress_middleware_x_progress_id.diff
and theese
4065-
streaming_uploads_and_uploadprogress_middleware_x_progress_id_windowsfix.diff
upload.py
middleware.py
using-feedparser.diff
using-feedparser.2.diff
modpyton-ok-needs-fcgi-testing.diff
It was in my my unit tests, instead of properly upload a file, I just
set the name to "whatever.pdf", but when I loaded the detail page,
Python couldn't find the file, so it raised an OSError. I don't think
I can qualify that as a bug.
On Feb 3, 4:52 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
I've also given this some consideration -- I haven't found any
information on this either.
It would be nice if the DB API could make use of the cache system
(memcached) if you attempt the lookup by ID. Synchronization becomes
more of a problem... and it certainly removes transactional safety
fro
On 2/3/07, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a better proposal. We can just defer getting 'choices' for
> until 'render' is called. Thus if the field is never displayed
> in template it won't hit database. I'm not sure how to do it properly
> though... I see two ways now:
>
> - Tu
Greetings,
I'd like to ask, why Django ORM has no concept of Identity Map? It is
strange for me that if I call get() five times I will get five object
instances, instead of five references to a single instance.
Was it a design decision? I'm unable to find any discussions of this.
Or I'm the firs
I need to return a queryset, to be serialized for ajax. I have a Store
object, which references a State object.
State.objects.all() currently returns the state value as the ID field
for the State object. But I need it to instead return the l_state
Any insight?
Thanks
Mike
See below:
===
On Feb 3, 5:04 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Filtering with javascript isn't too much needed, but the edit_inline
> with javascript is a cool thing I want to see in django that doesn't
> break backward compatibility. As I said, I can make this improvement
> on the django ad
Hi there
The newforms documentation still lacks a paragraph about converting model to
forms and posted form data back to models/db.
There are some tickets (3247, 3257) waiting for this documentation bit to be
written so they can submit a documentation path and become part of the svn
trunk.
Is
James Bennett wrote:
> One suggestion that I kind of like is the ability to pass a QuerySet
> to 'choices' and, in that case, have it generate the choices from,
> say, the id and __str__ of each object in the QuerySet.
Then you'll loose a 'blank' choice. Current Field.get_choices does a bit
more
On Feb 1, 4:16 pm, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ivan Sagalaev:
>
> > Michael Radziej wrote:
> >> d) make the database wrapper accept both unicode and bytestrings in
> >> the models, but always pass unicode strings to the database backend.
Sounds like a reasonable proposal. You ma
17 matches
Mail list logo
