Re: Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-26 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
On 2/26/07, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/27/07, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 2/26/07, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Specifically, I was referring to the has_*_permission() stuff in the > > > new ModelAdmin class. Which is

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-26 Thread Jay Parlar
On 2/26/07, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I for one am very keen to see RLP branch integrated and I tested it > months ago to my satisfaction. > > [1] > http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/f124083c6194dccc/ I too would be very excited to see it

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-26 Thread Matthew Flanagan
On 2/27/07, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/26/07, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Specifically, I was referring to the has_*_permission() stuff in the > > new ModelAdmin class. Which is new functionality aside from the > > oldforms to newforms port. > > A

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-26 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
On 2/26/07, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Specifically, I was referring to the has_*_permission() stuff in the > new ModelAdmin class. Which is new functionality aside from the > oldforms to newforms port. A lot of the generic-auth and RLP code is nasty stuff to try to integrate

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-26 Thread Matthew Flanagan
On 2/27/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/27/07, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 2/27/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I might have missed something in the discussions somewhere, but I > > > don't think this is true. Th

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-26 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 2/27/07, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/27/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I might have missed something in the discussions somewhere, but I > > don't think this is true. The newforms-admin is all about getting the > > admin views into newforms,

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-26 Thread Matthew Flanagan
On 2/27/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Feb 26, 3:15 pm, "Matthew Flanagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Add to that > > > > > > 3. Finish Schema evolution and merge to trunk > > > 4. Finish Row level p

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-26 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 2/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 26, 3:15 pm, "Matthew Flanagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Add to that > > > > 3. Finish Schema evolution and merge to trunk > > 4. Finish Row level permissions and merge to trunk > > Actually, I think that the row level perm

Re: Q Objects and Joins

2007-02-26 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 2/27/07, Mike Axiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyway, I'm about to overload the Q object. In this new object, Q' (i > still haven't got a good name for it), will look up the tree (or down) > for any ORs, and switch the join type from 'INNER JOIN' to 'OUTER > JOIN'. > I may have to overload

Kidney Problems !!! Kidney Care assistence

2007-02-26 Thread Rania
*Kidney Problems !!! Kidney Care Center* ** *Transplantation of Kidney and Dialysis of kidney* *Kidney Care Information* ** *[image: Kidney care specialist] * *http://www.100stuff.com/kidney/* ** *Kidney Specialist Assistence* *&* *Kidney care Information* ** ** *K

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 26, 3:15 pm, "Matthew Flanagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Add to that > > 3. Finish Schema evolution and merge to trunk > 4. Finish Row level permissions and merge to trunk Actually, I think that the row level permissions will mostly be handled by the newforms-admin branch. --~--~---

Re: get_FOO_basename() for FileFields

2007-02-26 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On 2/26/07, herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i've created a ticket (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3538) > which requests to add a function which returns the current basename of > an uploaded file to FileFields (ie. only the bare filename, without > any path information) .. since it was

Django's stance on adding filters to db core

2007-02-26 Thread Mike Axiak
Hello, I figured I had another question for you guys... I noticed that for MySQL you support 'search' in the QUERY_TERMS (and in the two other lines of code). I was just wondering, what's Django's decision for all the other really useful, and not cross-supported, DB search features. A couple examp

get_FOO_basename() for FileFields

2007-02-26 Thread herbert
hi, i've created a ticket (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3538) which requests to add a function which returns the current basename of an uploaded file to FileFields (ie. only the bare filename, without any path information) .. since it was rejected i was asked to bring this up here .. my p

Q Objects and Joins

2007-02-26 Thread Mike Axiak
Hello, Recently I've been working extensively with Q objects (that is, I've been doing some cool things to have a user automatically create a new set with arbitrary set combinations). Anyway, a lot of the combinations will not work without some hackery. The reason? Q Objects will (intelligently)

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-26 Thread Matthew Flanagan
On 2/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I be evil about proposals... > > 1. finish this http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/TextIndexingAbstractionLayer > and get i merged to trunk > 2. finish http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/FullHistory and get it > merged to trunk ;) > Add

Re: next_month, previous_month in django.views.generic.date_based.archive_month

2007-02-26 Thread Per Jonsson
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:17:35PM +0100, Per Jonsson wrote: > Isn't the sensible thing to add two template context variables, > next_object_date and previous_object_date? > > I'm willing to write the patch (and has almost done that, incorporating > the patch attached to bug #2368), but would lik

next_month, previous_month in django.views.generic.date_based.archive_month

2007-02-26 Thread Per Jonsson
I'm looking into bug #2368 (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2386), and I'm starting to think that some discussion is needed. The current patch attached to #2368 no longer applies, as changeset 3457 introduced changes (allow_future on date_based generic views). Isn't the sensible thing to a

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would like to see http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3297 implemented before 0.96 if possible. On 26 Feb, 19:09, "Rob Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 26, 9:46 am, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I've close #760 and #3335 with this comment: > > Design decisio

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread Rob Hudson
On Feb 26, 9:46 am, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've close #760 and #3335 with this comment: Design decision: Django won't include default 404 and 500 templates. OK. But does that invalidate those bugs? The default templates were a possible solution to fix both of them. Bo

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On 2/26/07, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could we get a design decision on whether to add default, non-django > looking 404 and 500 templates? I've close #760 and #3335 with this comment: """ Django's not going to ever include a default 404 or 500 template. If we do, people won't be

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I be evil about proposals... 1. finish this http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/TextIndexingAbstractionLayer and get i merged to trunk 2. finish http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/FullHistory and get it merged to trunk ;) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this me

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread Rob Hudson
Could we get a design decision on whether to add default, non-django looking 404 and 500 templates? It seems pretty minor but important as there are 2 cases where switching from DEBUG=True in development to DEBUG=False for production could end up biting you... 1) With DEBUG=False and a 500 occur

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread James Bennett
On 2/26/07, Espen Grindhaug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got a little suggestion, and I think a lot of people agrees with me: > how about trying to merge one or two of the 100 development branches > into trunk. We can only merge a branch when it's done, and unfortunately there aren't many branc

Re: Upcoming changes to the Django admin

2007-02-26 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On 2/26/07, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now for the inevitable question and probably irritating ;) question: > when are these changes scheduled to be included in the django tin? I'm guessing sometime between "tomorrow" and "when Perl 6 ships". With any luck it'll be closer to the forme

Re: Closing tickets at triage

2007-02-26 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On 2/26/07, Jeroen van Dongen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are more tickets like this, I also suspect that there are > tickets which are unreviewed and open, yet quietly solved or otherwise > no longer relevant as part of the ongoing improvements and changes > made to Django. > > However, th

Re: Looking for a Django Developer (web based feed aggregator)

2007-02-26 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On 2/26/07, Tixx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm looking for a Django developer who help us with the development of > a feed aggregator based on Django and Universal Feed Parser. Hi Tixx -- In the future, can you please direct questions of this nature to django-users? That list is for general d

Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-26 Thread Eugene Lazutkin
It is that time of year again! Google announced GSoC 2007, and this year the timeline was changed dramatically. Read FAQ [1], pay attention to new dates [2]. Most important upcoming dates are here: For Django organization: March 5: Mentoring organizations can begin submitting applications to Goo

Re: Looking for a Django Developer (web based feed aggregator)

2007-02-26 Thread Max Battcher
Have you seen Feedjack (http://www.feedjack.org/)? On 2/26/07, Tixx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > I'm looking for a Django developer who help us with the development of > a feed aggregator based on Django and Universal Feed Parser. > > Thanks. > > Best Regards, > Tiziano. > > > > > -- -

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread Espen Grindhaug
I got a little suggestion, and I think a lot of people agrees with me: how about trying to merge one or two of the 100 development branches into trunk. Anyhow once again thanks a lot for a great framework. Espen --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message bec

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread Brian Harring
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:04:29AM -0600, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > > On 2/25/07, Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3440 , Models.__init__ > > refactoring. > > #3440 is fixed and has to do with DateQuerySet; did you mean #3438? Pardon, 3438 is the

Re: Upcoming changes to the Django admin

2007-02-26 Thread Nate Straz
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:51:56AM -0600, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > Finally, the URLconf. For the default case (a single admin):: > > ('^admin/', include(admin.site.urls())) > > And for multiple admins:: > > ('^admin/', include(admin.site.urls())) > ('^admin2/', include(second_adm

Re: Django not thread-safe?

2007-02-26 Thread Ivan Sagalaev
Michael Radziej wrote: > Hi, > > Jacob states in Ticket #3357 [1] that Django were far from being > thread-safe. But on the other side, Django is able to run as threaded > fastcgi-server (at least with the right backend module version ...) > Isn't this a contradiction? > > References: > > [1] h

Re: Django not thread-safe?

2007-02-26 Thread Gábor Farkas
Michael Radziej wrote: > Hi, > > Jacob states in Ticket #3357 [1] that Django were far from being > thread-safe. But on the other side, Django > is able to run as threaded > fastcgi-server i think this part is the one where we have to be more exact. does that mean that : "it is guaranteed

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread Michael Radziej
Russell Keith-Magee: > Oops :-). To make up for my boo boo, please accept [4608] Merci! Anyways, duplicates are unavoidable in the Django ticket djungle ;-) Michael -- noris network AG - Deutschherrnstraße 15-19 - D-90429 Nürnberg - Tel +49-911-9352-0 - Fax +49-911-9352-100 http://www.noris

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 2/26/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think that a different exit code when one or more tests fail would > > really > > be helpful in case of automated tests. > > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3253 > > ;-) Oops :-). To make up for my boo boo, please accept [4608]

Django not thread-safe?

2007-02-26 Thread Michael Radziej
Hi, Jacob states in Ticket #3357 [1] that Django were far from being thread-safe. But on the other side, Django is able to run as threaded fastcgi-server (at least with the right backend module version ...) Isn't this a contradiction? References: [1] http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3357#co

Closing tickets at triage

2007-02-26 Thread Jeroen van Dongen
While browsing through the open, unreviewed tickets I encountered some tickets like 1049 (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1049) which imo should be closed/rejected for various reasons. In this case: 1) the topic of the ticket is oldforms, which will be phased out soon (hence it is unlikely t

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread Michael Radziej
Russell Keith-Magee: > Nice idea, and shouldn't be too much effort. I've logged the idea as > #3576 to make sure it doesn't get lost; I should get a chance to look > at it over the next few days. #3253 has a working patch with documentation. I've closed yours as duplicate of #3253. Michael --

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread Michael Radziej
Massimiliano Ravelli: > Hi Russ, > I'm using your latest patch (ticket #2333) in my applications: > I find it useful and extremely fast ! > > I configured the svn repository of my django apps to work with > buildbot and > have all tests done each time a commit is performed. > > Buildbot runs "py

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 2/26/07, Massimiliano Ravelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Russ, > I'm using your latest patch (ticket #2333) in my applications: > I find it useful and extremely fast ! Glad you like it. > I think that a different exit code when one or more tests fail would > really > be helpful in case

Re: Upcoming changes to the Django admin

2007-02-26 Thread patrick k.
sounds great. are there any plans to update/change the html/css-stuff? e.g., edit_inline is not displayed correctly. thanks, patrick Am 25.02.2007 um 07:51 schrieb Jacob Kaplan-Moss: > > Howdy folks -- > > After a wonderful Django meetup here at PyCon (Django: the framework > that buys you piz

Re: Upcoming changes to the Django admin

2007-02-26 Thread simonbun
"Now, one of the coolest parts of the newforms admin work is that you can easily override methods of the admin class to change the behavior of the admin." This feature alone will solve so many of the past problems I've faced using the admin contrib. When this gets implemented it will truly feel l

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread Massimiliano Ravelli
Hi Russ, I'm using your latest patch (ticket #2333) in my applications: I find it useful and extremely fast ! I configured the svn repository of my django apps to work with buildbot and have all tests done each time a commit is performed. Buildbot runs "python manage.py test" but shows the green

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-02-26 Thread Daniel Roseman
On 26 Feb, 04:56, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If there's a bug that's been annoying the heck out of you and you want > it fixed before the release, this would be the time to speak up about > it. Because you did ask, the one that's annoying me most at the moment (and preventing me

Re: Refactoring QuerySet

2007-02-26 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 2/25/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What would the new (QuerySet) world order look like > > What I propose to do is to split out the SQL construction from the body > of QuerySet and make it into a separate class. This c

Looking for a Django Developer (web based feed aggregator)

2007-02-26 Thread Tixx
Hi, I'm looking for a Django developer who help us with the development of a feed aggregator based on Django and Universal Feed Parser. Thanks. Best Regards, Tiziano. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups