On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 16:04 +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 12:44 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been looking at ticket #3297 - a request to implement FileField
> > and ImageField in newforms.
> >
> > Adrian's comments on this ticket, plus the
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 00:57 +, Iapain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if we can specify our own custom element like function
> in *search_field* in Admin class. e.g
>
> class Student(models.Model):
> name = models.CharField(maxlength=255)
>
> class Admin:
> search_list = ['name', '
Hi,
I was wondering if we can specify our own custom element like function
in *search_field* in Admin class. e.g
class Student(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(maxlength=255)
class Admin:
search_list = ['name', 'my_custom_list_or_object_row']
def my_custom_list_or_object_row(se
New patch uploaded, taking into account Brian's thoughts (and fixing a
small bug):
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3523#comment:11
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To
On Jun 5, 11:48 pm, Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comments on the patch/syntax at least; Offhand, test
> 'for-tag-unpack03' points out some uglyness in the api-
>
> {% for key value in items %}
> {{ key }}:{{ value }}/
> {% endfor %}
Regarding the whole comma/space issue, t
I replied to Ben via email, but for the group, again: multi-db needs a
new maintainer. I don't have the time to keep up with merging it, let
alone to add new features or complete the documentation. I think Ben
has some excellent ideas here and would be a great maintainer
candidate.
JP
On Jun 5,
On Jun 2, 1:15 am, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> We talked about this a while back: Django really needs a buildbot (or
> some other continuous integration tool). I had planned to tackle this
> myself (using Bitten --http://bitten.cmlenz.net/) but it's getting
> clear I'm not goi
On 6/5/07, Ilya Semenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I run into the problem that the module doesn't seem to work well with
> Apache+mod_python. The new values are actually saved to the db, but
> not used until I restart Apache (neither as class members nor in the
> admin settings panel). I think t
Personally, I'd like the patch to go in; the support is far easier on
the eyes reading wise, and it has the nice side affect of speeding up
the access- index access is last in the chain for var resolution,
meaning several pricey exceptions/tests occur every access.
Faster resolution, and cleane
Yes,Waylan Limberg
Do you mean it is the problem of PyPI but not django?
On 6月5日, 上午12时06分, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 6/4/07, kernel1983 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Setuptools is a powerful tools for python.
>
> > When could django support it? At Version One?
>
>
On 6/5/07, David Larlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2007/6/5, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Ticket http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3523 has been sitting
> > quietly for a couple of months as a design decision and it's a
> > reasonably common question in the IRC channel so I thou
2007/6/5, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Ticket http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3523 has been sitting
> quietly for a couple of months as a design decision and it's a
> reasonably common question in the IRC channel so I thought I'd ask a
> core developer for a decision.
>
I'm not a cor
On 6/5/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 05, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> > The number "4" exists as a piece of data, irrelevant of
> > whether it was created by a user, a machine or a bunny rabbit.
>
> I hope no animals were harmed for producing this e-mail? ;-)
Onl
In django/contrib/admin/templatetags/admin_list.py in function
result_headers AttributeError is being propagated (apparently it was a
design decision) when getattr fails on the model.
This causes some problems with dynamically generated
fields/properties/methods. I stumbled across it when I tried
Marty,
Thanks for your work!
I run into the problem that the module doesn't seem to work well with
Apache+mod_python. The new values are actually saved to the db, but
not used until I restart Apache (neither as class members nor in the
admin settings panel). I think that's because of the per-pro
On Tue, Jun 05, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> The number "4" exists as a piece of data, irrelevant of
> whether it was created by a user, a machine or a bunny rabbit.
I hope no animals were harmed for producing this e-mail? ;-)
--
noris network AG - Deutschherrnstraße 15-19 - D-90429 Nürnberg -
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> No. It has strong "user created semantics", which are orthogonal to the
> data itself. The number "4" exists as a piece of data, irrelevant of
> whether it was created by a user, a machine or a bunny rabbit. The
> database doesn't care. Code using that data doesn't care
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 09:42 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> > What I'd like to see us do is move "editable" out of the model field
> > declaration entirely as part of newforms-admin. It's presentation
> > related, has no place there and is one of the
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 12:00 +0400, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > What I'd like to see us do is move "editable" out of the model field
> > declaration entirely as part of newforms-admin. It's presentation
> > related
>
> I disagree with this specific point. "Editable" is use
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> What I'd like to see us do is move "editable" out of the model field
> declaration entirely as part of newforms-admin. It's presentation
> related
I disagree with this specific point. "Editable" is useful to distinguish
calculated (or automatically produced, if you pr
On Tue, Jun 05, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> What I'd like to see us do is move "editable" out of the model field
> declaration entirely as part of newforms-admin. It's presentation
> related, has no place there and is one of the few remaining ugly spots
> of that nature. [...]
+1
In addition to
Hello! (Internet is acting up; I hope this doesn't double-post.)
It's been a week since coding started. In the meantime I've been
fleshing out the interface for the new QuerySet and incorporating
suggestions from last week. I implemented a 'registry' that tracks
cached QuerySets and listens for i
22 matches
Mail list logo
