Re: boulder-oracle-sprint branch has been merged into trunk!

2007-06-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 25, 11:49 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 00:53 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [...] > > > Hi Malcolm, > > > While your tinkering with the backends can you fix #708 which relates > > to the postgresql backend's unique use (as compared to all

Re: Django Week in Review -- ATTN: Adrian Holovaty

2007-06-24 Thread Clint Ecker
Thanks,I'll change that and keep it in mind for future stuff :) Clint On 6/24/07, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Looks good to me, but I do have one thing to mention (and it's nothing > you did wrong, don't worry): > > I'd prefer to be mentioned as Marty Alchin instead of Gulopine

Re: Django Week in Review -- ATTN: Adrian Holovaty

2007-06-24 Thread Clint Ecker
Good catch. I just wanted to make it clear that it was backward-incompatible. I really had to scrape to find some interesting changesets for the week as I'd already gotten the big ones in the main section. I'm not sure whether I should scrape the 3 items in that section or move in the bigger

Re: Django Week in Review -- ATTN: Adrian Holovaty

2007-06-24 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 21:21 -0500, Clint Ecker wrote: [...] > Let me know what you guys think of the tone, my wordiness, how I split > up the post into "random weblinks," changeset roundup, and SoC stuff, > and anything else that comes to mind. Again, please keep in mind that > this sort of

Re: Django Week in Review -- ATTN: Adrian Holovaty

2007-06-24 Thread Marty Alchin
Looks good to me, but I do have one thing to mention (and it's nothing you did wrong, don't worry): I'd prefer to be mentioned as Marty Alchin instead of Gulopine R. Holiture, as that (nade-up) name has a long, strange history[1], and it would probably just serve to confuse people. I do sign my

Django Week in Review -- ATTN: Adrian Holovaty

2007-06-24 Thread Clint Ecker
Hey everyone. I've got a draft prepared of my first Django Week In Review for tomorrow. I know that it's extremely long compared to previous WIRs, but I'm trying to catch up for about 2 month's worth here ;) I've not been able to get in contact with Adrian this past week to arrange for posting

Re: newforms-admin: queryset as list_filter

2007-06-24 Thread Brian Rosner
Adrian posted an idea that would actually be very neat and solve your problem too. Check out http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3987. I started some work on a better patch using the ModelAdmin hooks, but don't think I will be getting it done very soon. But a starting place none the less ;)

Re: boulder-oracle-sprint branch has been merged into trunk!

2007-06-24 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 00:53 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > Hi Malcolm, > > While your tinkering with the backends can you fix #708 which relates > to the postgresql backend's unique use (as compared to all the other > backends) of the inet type of IPAddressFields? Dude, Jacob touched

Re: BooleanField and NullBooleanField (#2855 again)

2007-06-24 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 08:35 -0700, Mads Sulau Joergensen wrote: > Hi. > > Having looked at #2855 and wondered the resolution of that ticket, There's been no resolution on that ticket, from what I can see. Still open. > i > wanted to raise the discussion again. > > To me, and many others, it

Re: boulder-oracle-sprint branch has been merged into trunk!

2007-06-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 24, 12:23 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In [5519] I have committed the Oracle branch changes into trunk. I've > tested all five previously supported backends, plus the new Oracle code > and all the tests pass for all of them (except for the expected MySQL > backend

Re: BooleanField and NullBooleanField (#2855 again)

2007-06-24 Thread Carl Karsten
Mads Sulau Joergensen wrote: > Hi. > > Having looked at #2855 and wondered the resolution of that ticket, i > wanted to raise the discussion again. > > To me, and many others, it makes absolutly no sense, that a > BooleanField with no default value given, sould yield a SQL error > uppon saving

Re: Inline editing without a parent model

2007-06-24 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
On 6/24/07, Tomi Pieviläinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Will there be a possibility to use edit_inline with a model that > doesn't have a parent model in newforms admin? It would be really > useful to see other lines when you need to input relatively same data > (and I was planning to hack

BooleanField and NullBooleanField (#2855 again)

2007-06-24 Thread Mads Sulau Joergensen
Hi. Having looked at #2855 and wondered the resolution of that ticket, i wanted to raise the discussion again. To me, and many others, it makes absolutly no sense, that a BooleanField with no default value given, sould yield a SQL error uppon saving it. The ticket states that a BooleanField

Re: Working example of FormPreview?

2007-06-24 Thread Nash
Thanks for letting me know, I appreciate your courtesy. WS -Nash On Jun 24, 4:15 pm, "Paul Bowsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your question, but this group is intended for developers working > on Django itself. If you're using Django to develop a website, you should > use

Inline editing without a parent model

2007-06-24 Thread Tomi Pieviläinen
Will there be a possibility to use edit_inline with a model that doesn't have a parent model in newforms admin? It would be really useful to see other lines when you need to input relatively same data (and I was planning to hack some kind of copy functionality in). If this is not going to happen,

Re: Working example of FormPreview?

2007-06-24 Thread Paul Bowsher
Hi, Thanks for your question, but this group is intended for developers working on Django itself. If you're using Django to develop a website, you should use this group: http://groups.google.com/group/django-users Thanks, On 6/24/07, Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > Does anyone