Leo Soto M. wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Deryck Hodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I completely agree you shouldn't use this middleware unless you know
>> and trust the proxy setup, but I can easily imagine (large corporate
>> networks) a situation where there could be multiple proxies. Seems to
2007/9/22, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 9/21/07, Yuri Baburov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please, read my whole post.
> > I don't want to create my own implementation of filters.
> > I don't want to create my own implementation of changelist sorting.
> > etc.
>
> If you don't need
> On 9/21/07, Yuri Baburov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I like newforms-admin very much, because it's customizeable.
> > But now imagine that you have 10 usual models in admin interface, but
> > 11th needs to be special.
> > One possible example: you need to show, how much LogEntries for each
>
On 9/21/07, Yuri Baburov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please, read my whole post.
> I don't want to create my own implementation of filters.
> I don't want to create my own implementation of changelist sorting.
> etc.
If you don't need a custom implementation of those bits, don't write
custom
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 01:24 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been looking at #5553 [1] tonight; it looks to be a good patch to
> fix some Datetime serialization issues that have arisen recently.
>
> [1] http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5553
>
> It's a fairly small
2007/9/22, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 9/21/07, Yuri Baburov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I like newforms-admin very much, because it's customizeable.
> > But now imagine that you have 10 usual models in admin interface, but
> > 11th needs to be special.
> > One possible example:
On 9/21/07, Yuri Baburov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like newforms-admin very much, because it's customizeable.
> But now imagine that you have 10 usual models in admin interface, but
> 11th needs to be special.
> One possible example: you need to show, how much LogEntries for each
> model was
Hi All,
I like newforms-admin very much, because it's customizeable.
But now imagine that you have 10 usual models in admin interface, but
11th needs to be special.
One possible example: you need to show, how much LogEntries for each
model was created by each user for some date interval.
What
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:43:26PM -0500, James Bennett wrote:
>
> While I'm all in favor of faster template variable resolution, I've
> been poking at the new Variable class and noticed that the patch was
> apparently never updated for a post-Unicode Django; in some fairly
> simple tests I've
On 9/22/07, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a couple of reservations about the version of app commands that
> got committed and just wanted to bring them up here.
...
> I'm worried that we're setting ourselves up for two things:
> 1. Name collisions.
> 2. Command confusion.
I
While I'm all in favor of faster template variable resolution, I've
been poking at the new Variable class and noticed that the patch was
apparently never updated for a post-Unicode Django; in some fairly
simple tests I've been able to break it pretty badly by passing in
Unicode strings and
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 01:35 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ticket 5446 discusses some ideas for putting more international
> country data into Django. The ticket is here -
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5446
>
> The last comment is a request to bring to this list for comment. So,
>
I have a couple of reservations about the version of app commands that
got committed and just wanted to bring them up here.
In my original patch you had to use the following form for app-supplied
commands:
$ django-admin.py app_name.command
I also separated out the help contents by app so that
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 09:17 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 9/22/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > BTW, wouldn't it be nice (TM) if new commits first went to side branch and
> > only get committed to trunk after the buildbot has given green light? I have
> > no idea
Ticket 5446 discusses some ideas for putting more international
country data into Django. The ticket is here -
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5446
The last comment is a request to bring to this list for comment. So,
here I am ;)
The gist is that this is a request to add some
On Sat, Sep 22, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> It is probably worth opening a ticket so that this idea doesn't get
> forgotten.
#5571
G'night!
Michael
--
noris network AG - Deutschherrnstraße 15-19 - D-90429 Nürnberg -
Tel +49-911-9352-0 - Fax +49-911-9352-100
http://www.noris.de - The
On 22 sep, 03:21, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, msaelices wrote:
>
> > You don't see well the code.
>
> Oh, you're right!
>
> I better stop triaging and go to bed now ;-)
Good night. I do the same (It's 3:26AM) :-(
>
> To quote Malcolm: Sorry for the unconvenience
On Fri, Sep 21, msaelices wrote:
>
> You don't see well the code.
Oh, you're right!
I better stop triaging and go to bed now ;-)
To quote Malcolm: Sorry for the unconvenience ;-)
Michael
--
noris network AG - Deutschherrnstraße 15-19 - D-90429 Nürnberg -
Tel +49-911-9352-0 - Fax
On 9/22/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the inconvienience.
>
> Oh come on ... go ahead and let's have a bit more of these buglets, so that
> the rest of us feel less bad for proposing wrong patches ;-)
Oh... ok then.
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 22:43 +, Andrew Durdin wrote:
> I was looking into #4796, and submitted a patch that fixes the error
> -- and I'm fairly sure that it fixes it in the appropriate spot.
> However, I didn't quite grok the runtime interaction between the
> __proxy__ objects and the
You don't see well the code. The code does caching of
django_contenttype table like the other file. It reduces by caching
this SQL sentence:
obj1.related_object
select * from django_content_types where id = 4 ---> a content type
for one relationship
select * from myapp_mytable where id = 27 --->
On 9/22/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> would be nice if a commit could clean up the current trunk, there's a
> trivial typo. See ticket #5569
Fixed in [6404]. Sorry for the inconvienience.
Yours
Russ Magee %-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
On Fri, Sep 21, msaelices wrote:
>
> I have uploaded a patch for improve generic relations performance:
>
>http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5570
>
> But mir closed my ticket because it think patch is not convenient.
>
> I think there are a lot of files with same type of caching. I
The problem is the [[TOC]] proccessor situated on top:
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Tutorials
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to
I have uploaded a patch for improve generic relations performance:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5570
But mir closed my ticket because it think patch is not convenient.
I think there are a lot of files with same type of caching. I don't
use django cache framework. I use a simple
Hi,
would be nice if a commit could clean up the current trunk, there's a
trivial typo. See ticket #5569
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5569
Michael
--
noris network AG - Deutschherrnstraße 15-19 - D-90429 Nürnberg -
Tel +49-911-9352-0 - Fax +49-911-9352-100
http://www.noris.de - The
I was looking into #4796, and submitted a patch that fixes the error
-- and I'm fairly sure that it fixes it in the appropriate spot.
However, I didn't quite grok the runtime interaction between the
__proxy__ objects and the delayed_loader function, so I'd appreciate
it if someone else could cast
I'm +1 as well, I think it will be handy.
On 9/21/07, Jan Oberst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 21, 10:29 pm, Matt Boersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sep 21, 2007, at 2:22 PM, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Sep 19, 11:44 pm, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL
On Sep 21, 10:29 pm, Matt Boersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2007, at 2:22 PM, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 19, 11:44 pm, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Now we just need to get someone to put it on the site...
>
> > +1. Easy to do, looks
On Sep 21, 2007, at 2:22 PM, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 11:44 pm, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Now we just need to get someone to put it on the site...
>
> +1. Easy to do, looks good.
+1. It's excellent.
Currently the docs [1] say "Note that this should have a trailing
slash if it has a path component."
Common use is now href="{{ MEDIA_URL }}images/a.png" so it seems to me
like you should *always* put a trailing slash in, whether there is a
path component or not.
Am I missing something?
[1]
On Sep 19, 11:44 pm, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now we just need to get someone to put it on the site...
+1. Easy to do, looks good.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django
I absolutely agree; I think Ned's icon looks great. A favicon would
make the Django site more professional, and that cannot be a bad
thing.
On Sep 19, 6:44 am, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree that a favicon is one of those fit-and-finish touches that helps
> complete a
Hi all,
I've been looking at #5553 [1] tonight; it looks to be a good patch to
fix some Datetime serialization issues that have arisen recently.
[1] http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5553
It's a fairly small change, but I'm still coming to terms with the
finer points of the unicode changes,
On 9/21/07, Deryck Hodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Of course, this is straying a bit from the original topic. I still
> think the middleware as reverted by Jacob is correct. Whether or not
> you trust REMOTE_ADDR to be the actual client IP after using the
> middleware is a matter of
On 9/21/07, Tristan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok I've been working on the problem quoted at the end of this email and have
> come up with a solution. but i'm not sure what to make of it.
[...]
> My question is. Why, if in CPython object.__unicode__ doesn't exist, why
> does it in
Ok I've been working on the problem quoted at the end of this email and have
come up with a solution. but i'm not sure what to make of it.
Poll extends from Model and does not implement __str__ or __unicode__, but
inherits __str__ from Model, which calls __unicode__, and __unicode__ from
object.
On 9/20/07, Chris Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As an aside, is anyone talking about seriously using this for access
> control? We've established that using X-F-F is a bad idea for that, in
> fact, I'd say that even known REMOTE_ADDR based auth is a bad idea, so
> why does it matter
On 9/20/07, Leo Soto M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/20/07, Deryck Hodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > A quick Google search turns up that this is indeed easily configurable
> > for both Squid and mod_proxy and the defaults look sane.
>
> What are those defaults?.
>
> My google-foo is
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 12:47 +, Philippe Raoult wrote:
> I was wondering why there is no 096-bugfixes branch. Does that reflect
> a policy change since previous versions ?
Well, the policy is that the -bugfixes branch was for security fixes
only. We haven't had to do a security release yet
I was wondering why there is no 096-bugfixes branch. Does that reflect
a policy change since previous versions ? Since 0.97 looks pretty far
away with all the merging waiting to happen (queryset-refactor &
newforms-admin at least), would it make sense to backport a few
bugfixes and maybe a couple
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 05:22 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all. I'll first state that I'm not a django developer (my only
> patch was rejected and that's sad, cause I've learned python only to
> make it :( ). Yet I like django, I have started to work with it, for
> some experiments, and
Hi all. I'll first state that I'm not a django developer (my only
patch was rejected and that's sad, cause I've learned python only to
make it :( ). Yet I like django, I have started to work with it, for
some experiments, and came to think of something wrong with the way
the templates work, or
43 matches
Mail list logo
