On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 06:37 +, aruns wrote:
> Hello,
> I am a new to Django..
> i just wanted to know if i could reverse engineer an existing
> database tables to Model.py files
>
> is there any tool to do this?
I suggest django make at least a upgrade so that we can use command
like:
easy_install http://www.djangoproject.com/download/0.96.1/tarball/
Many of my friend start django on windows platform but failed to
install... This issue of installing on windows has a long history.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following:
> 1) just form.FIELDNAME. It's quite obvious and is not occupied by
> anything.
Uh, yes it is :)
{{ form.foo }} prints the input for the foo field
> 2) form.show_FIELDNAME
> 3) form.show(FIELDNAME), where FIELDNAME is a string. But this one
> can't be
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 17:29 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Currently when person needs to render form into template using
> newforms, he has two options:
> 1) Use shortcut as_p / as_table / as_ul
> or
> 2) Use customised output, something like
> {{ field.label_tag }}
> {{
Hello everyone,
Currently when person needs to render form into template using
newforms, he has two options:
1) Use shortcut as_p / as_table / as_ul
or
2) Use customised output, something like
{{ field.label_tag }}
{{ field }}
{% if field.help_text %}{{ field.help_text }}{% endif %}
{% if
Thanks! That worked and my apologies for using the wrong list :(.
Chris.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to
Looks like you want to just add '/Users/rudolph/Sites' to your
PythonPath: this is the path that Python is searching for the moose
module in, not the path of the moose module itself (therefore just
get rid of the trailing moose). You'll probably also want to
reference your settings module
On 10/29/07, Ed Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know if there are any plans to merge the multi-db branch
> [1]. I see in ticket #1142 that things are kind of quiet on the
> development side. Did this come up at all during the big spring of
> 14-Sep-2007?
You probably want to
Another note:, the peak load we see on the site is around 60 or 70
requests per second. With 4 gigs of ram and each apache instance
weighing in at 60 megs, we can only start 67 apache processes, which
can sometimes cause problems.
The processor is a quad core Xeon, so it is not being used to
Is there anyone out there using mod_wsgi on a high-traffic site who
can vouch for how it performs?
If I were to switch all of my sites over to mod_wsgi over mod_python,
would the server become CPU bound instead of memory-bound?
On Oct 26, 7:10 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
To me having the two mutually-exclusive arguments sounds too much like
trying to fake static typing in a dynamic language. I don't see the
advantage of separate names for basically the same information provided in
different ways. If it walks like a duck...
if callable(upload_to):
Am Freitag, 26. Oktober 2007 15:39 schrieb Marty Alchin:
> Okay, just a quick update. I don't have a new patch ready yet, because
> I wanted to outline a couple things and ask another question. I've
> implemented the callable method for determining filenames, including
> the ability to include a
12 matches
Mail list logo
