Hi Julien,
On Jun 3, 8:18 am, Julien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Karen,
>
> I confirm that I get the error both in the admin and in front-end
> views.
>
> Here the example there is a combination of things that makes the
> situation a bit complex. Indeed, the 2 abstract models (FileGalleried
Hi Karen,
I confirm that I get the error both in the admin and in front-end
views.
Here the example there is a combination of things that makes the
situation a bit complex. Indeed, the 2 abstract models (FileGalleried
and Avatared) both have a reference to a same model (FileGallery).
Because
Hi Yurii,
I will help you if you will start the project. I use python since 2004.
I'm definitely lacking easily-distributed and fast document-based DB for python.
Couple of comments:
Use list comprehensions instead of ruby-blocks for python, they are neat ;)
And python has some storages that
> Perhaps bedros meant to ask if anyone is working on support in Django
> for any "document based" databases.
>
> strokeDBlooks (to my untrained eye) similar to CouchDB. You'll find
> plenty to read if you do a search for "couchdb django".
By the way, I was thinking about StrokeDB clone in
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Leo Soto M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > dates, times, and datetimes are converted to string _before_ being
> > passed to the backend.
>
> Oops :)
>
> > b) Pass the backend (or
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:56 AM, Julien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've identified something that appears to me as a bug. I found a quick
> fix, but I'd like to hear from some advised people to know what's the
> best way to go, or if I'm simply missing the point.
>
> You can copy/paste
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Nicolas Lara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I dont mind changing it to indexes. To me it is more readable with the
> list copying/slicing. I might do a bit of profiling for that to see
> the efficiency gain or simple change it to indexes. I'll write back
> about
Hi,
I've identified something that appears to me as a bug. I found a quick
fix, but I'd like to hear from some advised people to know what's the
best way to go, or if I'm simply missing the point.
You can copy/paste the code from: http://dpaste.com/hold/54289/
Simply put, there are 2 models
Sorry 'bout that :) . I don't think the why of it ultimately matters,
code snippet Russell used does the same thing at the SQL-aggregation
stuff does, the speed difference should hold. Plus I agree it looks
cleaner.
On Jun 2, 1:31 am, Ludvig Ericson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> s = 'abc'
> t = s[:]
> s is t
>> True
>>
>> I'm willing to be corrected here, but my understanding was that for
>> loop iteration was one of those optimization cases.
>
> It looks like it's an immutable-optimization from my further
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
