On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 9:45 PM, diogobaeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
Hi!
> I'm willing to start contributing to Django, already, but in a field
> that will not be hard for me to understand, and in which I can be more
> usefull: the Brazillian-Portuguese translation package. I'd like to
Johannes Dollinger wrote:
[...]
> Of course that's subjective, everything is.
>
Really? That's a bit sweeping.
"The atomic number of hydrogen is 1" (IMHO?).
regards
Steve
Who just felt like picking this particular nit. Sorry.
--
Steve Holden+1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119
Holden
Am 20.07.2008 um 21:48 schrieb Malcolm Tredinnick:
>> Especially unquoted non-ascii strings (as in test url05) are ugly
>
> Subjective; not a technical reason. Non-ASCII strings look just the
> same
> as ASCII strings. In fact, many non-Latin scripts are much prettier
> than
> the Latin
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 21:37 +0200, Johannes Dollinger wrote:
> I'd prefer treating unquoted parameters as variables.
We've already had this thread in the past. It's really up to Adrian and
Jacob now, although technically, the decision's been made: there just
isn't the interest to change and it
I'd prefer treating unquoted parameters as variables. If that's not
possible make url accept a quoted view name and deprecate unquoted
view names.
Especially unquoted non-ascii strings (as in test url05) are ugly and
would require hacks or re.LOCALE in my approach in #7806.
Am 20.07.2008
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 17:16 +0400, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> Julien Phalip wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For months, there has been a mention in the url tag's documentation:
> >
> > "Note that the syntax for this tag may change in the future, as we
> > make it more robust." [1]
> >
> > Is that mention
On Jul 18, 1:21 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When the time comes there will be a large and loud public announcement
> that you will not be able to miss.
Somehow when those large and loud public announcements happen I seem
to get them about 10 minutes after everyone else.
Hi Victor,
http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/821/ ?
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:36 PM, vicvicvic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In the Django FAQ, we can read this about views:
>
>>In our interpretation of MVC, the "view" describes the data that gets
>>presented to the user. It's not
Julien Phalip wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For months, there has been a mention in the url tag's documentation:
>
> "Note that the syntax for this tag may change in the future, as we
> make it more robust." [1]
>
> Is that mention still relevant for 1.0 and beyond?
If I recall correctly, there was a
On Jul 8, 3:34 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Currently, ReverseSingleRelatedObjectDescriptor uses _default_manager,
> > which is the problem (line 239 in django/db/models/related/fields.py).
> > One
Wow, thanks for all the hard work to everyone involved! This is really
awesome!
I'll update the Dutch translations soon. And I'll have to start
preparing my company's 30+ Django projects for this change... ;)
Rudolph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
I'd like to put in a good word for #4534 and its patch.
I know this has been discussed before, and that is *is* possible to write
view code to pass along extra data to a template to get the same effect as
ifchanged/else, but it's a lot cleaner, IMHO, to support this in templates
and to avoid
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They'll have to be done manually. But I just pinged Brian on IRC and he
> was going to go through and check that stuff (and some others). So I'll
> leave it in his capable hands.
I can automatically do it today
13 matches
Mail list logo
