Re: Feedback: Syndication feed views

On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > Code-wise, though, everything looks fine. Don't worry too much about > getting to all the formal stuff: I'll probably be committing this > today. Or not. There's a failing test in your patch::

Re: Oracle backend TextField unique=True error

On Dec 18, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Peter Herndon wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've run into a situation where syncdb produces an error on one of my models >> against Oracle, but not against Postgres. Using Postgres, one can mark

Re: Final call for feedback: Multi-db

On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Brett Hoerner wrote: > I'm not sure if 1.2 intended to fully support read-slaves, but I'll > post this quick anyway as we've just run into it while trying to > upgrade at DISQUS. > > You might think that having support for multiple

Re: Feedback: Syndication feed views

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Ben Firshman wrote: > Patch and ticket done. Any comments? It's looking pretty perfect to me. The only things I can see missing are the various formal bits of deprecating the old and documenting the new: you need deprecation warnings, notes

Re: Final call for feedback: Multi-db

On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Jani Tiainen wrote: > Haven't run any tests, but as a small request - I would be very happy that > you guys take a look ticket #11017 it's quite performance killer to some > selects on char fields (specially startswith) on Oracle. This has

Re: Final call for feedback: Multi-db

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a second and final call for feedback on the multidb branch. > > Barring any objections or the discovery of major problems, my > intention is to commit this early next week, hitting the