Re: Ticket #8425 and USStateField (again)

On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 11:44 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > This is completely backwards compatible as long as we keep > "STATE_CHOICES" to the same subset that exists today. Yikes, that's really restrictive. You want that list to remain static until Django 2.0? I ask because the Canadian

Re: 1.2 Feature freeze

A bit late, but here's my update to GSoC-1 (admin-ui). My branch is in good shape, but tests are sparse and docs are nonexistant. Two more weeks is enough time for me to get the following done: 1) Moar tests 2) Merge with trunk 3) Split out each feature into individual patches and throw them

Re: 1.2 Feature freeze

Since it appears there are some people who have code ready but have time constraints due to holidays, I'm going to (by release-manager fiat, unless Adrian or Jacob want something else) plan 1.2 alpha (and corresponding major feature freeze) for Tuesday, January 5. Any major feature not in trunk by

Re: 1.2 Feature freeze

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:34 AM, James Bennett wrote: > Technically, the major feature freeze for Django 1.2 was to have > happened sometime yesterday, US Central time. As of this moment, we're > not actually frozen, but will be as soon as I hear status reports on > the

Re: 1.2 Feature freeze

Hi everybody, model-validation patch hasn't changed since September (except merges with trunk) basically, there is one outstanding issue (#12078) that I can fix over the holidays. Also a merge with current trunk needs to be done because of the huge changes in the past few days. I have both time

Re: Which textmate django bundle?

VIM. django-dev is for discussion of developing Django itself! zweb schrieb: > I see there are multiple django bundles for textmate. > > Which is the best one you recommend? > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To

Re: 1.2 Feature freeze

I'm listed as one of the interested committers on GSoC-6 (test improvements). Unfortunately I have not had time to devote to moving that along, and so far as I know nobody else has either -- I have not seen any activity or patches or discussion that would indicate anyone was hoping to get

Re: Add querystring helper methods to Page class

2009/12/22 Ben Spaulding : > I have created a patch that would allow for something much simpler, like so: > > Next page This is what I do in my own homemade paginators. It works well. > Though there has been much talk of creating template tags which would > produce

Re: 1.2 Feature freeze

On Dec 23, 8:34 am, James Bennett wrote: > * URLs-1 (get_absolute_url replacement) The code's not ready - I have the get_url / get_url_path methods but I don't have a good enough hold yet on what actually needs to be done to replace the existing get_absolute_url behaviour

Re: Final call for feedback: Multi-db

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Michael Manfre wrote: > With multiple database defined, what is the expected behavior for > syncdb and the other db related commands? The management commands all work the same way under multidb - they only ever work on a single database at a

1.2 Feature freeze

Technically, the major feature freeze for Django 1.2 was to have happened sometime yesterday, US Central time. As of this moment, we're not actually frozen, but will be as soon as I hear status reports on the following (high-priority features which have not yet listed a commit on the 1.2 features