About idea of use settings.py to set a default site, -1
About ask to user what is yours default site, +1
This thing only runs at syncdb, so I really don't think that a entry in
settings.py is needed.
2010/5/18 Oldřich Jedlička
> Hi,
>
> 2010/3/19 dalore
Ian, thanks for the feedback, but what your concern is not related to
this proposal.
What you're talking about is issuing a BEGIN while already in a database
transaction, which is normally an error, with no standard meaning or
definition in SQL's transaction model. It's completely up to the
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Carl Gieringer
wrote:
> Hi Djangonauts,
>
> I'd like to call attention to a patch[0] I submitted last week for
> #6870[1]. From one perspective, this ticket is a version of the "My
> models with foreign keys are deleted when their
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Alberto Paro wrote:
> I'm developing a big application that does some complex mixing of database:
> SQL and notSQL one.
> I'm using the multidb to manage all the stuff in a django manner, using
> routing to route items in MongoDB and
Hi,
2010/3/19 dalore
> Because of this thread I decided to release a little app we have been
> using internally. It's a straightforward way to modify the default
> site object.
>
> More details: http://oppian.com/labs/django-defaultsite/
>
> Any comments/suggestions welcome.
On May 18, 5:41 pm, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:45 AM, SmileyChris wrote:
> > Can't investigate too much more until tomorrow, but it's a pretty big
> > regression so I thought I'd bring it up here for discussion as well as
> >
I'm developing a big application that does some complex mixing of database: SQL
and notSQL one.
I'm using the multidb to manage all the stuff in a django manner, using routing
to route items in MongoDB and Postgresql.
Some bugs that I've discovered:
1) django is unable to manage different
> Yes: we're talking about Django's transaction management layer (that is, the
> code in django.db.transaction), which controls how Python-level transaction
> blocks map to SQL transactions.
>
> The original email and writeup has a full explanation. :)
>
Yes. What I was getting at is that
2010/5/18 Ian Lewis :
> Am I missing something? Are we talking about doing some kind of
> transaction management at the application level?
Yes: we're talking about Django's transaction management layer (that is, the
code in django.db.transaction), which controls how