Re: Any interest in adding a navigation helper to Django?

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote: > I think the thing that would be helpful to most django users is bit > really a navigation helper per se. I think what I need could be solved > with a more generic tool. I don't doubt that for a second. What I'm

Re: Any interest in adding a navigation helper to Django?

I think the thing that would be helpful to most django users is bit really a navigation helper per se. I think what I need could be solved with a more generic tool. Russell, tell me what you think about providing a way to make a view a "child" of another. I'm not speaking in the CMS sense (e.g.

Re: CSRF Middleware/SSL/Firefox 3.6.8 bug

On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 11:20 +0100, Mat Clayton wrote: > I forgot to mention that as well, not to mention that they can be > spooked pretty easily as well, although in this case thats not really > a concern. Any chance of getting some of the core dev's to think about > removing additional SSL

Re: CSRF Middleware/SSL/Firefox 3.6.8 bug

We dug into it a little further here, and it looks like it might be the office firewall stripping it out, also seen some personal firewall products do it as well. Mat On 27 August 2010 17:28, Waylan Limberg wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Florian Apolloner >

Re: CSRF Middleware/SSL/Firefox 3.6.8 bug

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Florian Apolloner wrote: > On Aug 27, 12:20 pm, Mat Clayton wrote: >> Any >> chance of getting some of the core dev's to think about removing additional >> SSL checks, as FF 3.6.8 is a pretty major browser to support and

Re: Any interest in adding a navigation helper to Django?

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Russell Keith-Magee < russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > > Navigation menus strike me as something that: > * Can live happily outside the core - it doesn't need to integrate > closely with any part of the Django stack. > > * Isn't a problem that everyone has. > >

Re: Feature request - set variables in template

I think the thread Brian is thinking of is this one: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/31f0d2302c07a75b/1c41d02147316f3e?lnk=gst=New+context#1c41d02147316f3e If everyone can agree on the tag's syntax, I'd definitely work on writing the patch. Alex On Aug 26,

Re: CSRF Middleware/SSL/Firefox 3.6.8 bug

On Aug 27, 12:20 pm, Mat Clayton wrote: > Any > chance of getting some of the core dev's to think about removing additional > SSL checks, as FF 3.6.8 is a pretty major browser to support and this is > likely to only get worse as adoption increases. Is the additional security >

Re: CSRF Middleware/SSL/Firefox 3.6.8 bug

Note this strict checking has been discussed before: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/22058adaf11e3ed6 Karen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: Proposal: Editable Model AutoField

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Russell Keith-Magee < russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Joshua Russo > wrote: > > I've developed and I'm currently using a mod to allow auto-increment id > > fields to be editable. I'm curious if I should

Re: CSRF Middleware/SSL/Firefox 3.6.8 bug

I forgot to mention that as well, not to mention that they can be spooked pretty easily as well, although in this case thats not really a concern. Any chance of getting some of the core dev's to think about removing additional SSL checks, as FF 3.6.8 is a pretty major browser to support and this