Re: Changes in django/utils/autoreload.py breaks execution from IDE

Also, there is a big hope that something like 1.3.1 release will be produced soon as Django 1.3 without r15911 is still IDE unfriendly. -- Thanks, Dmitry On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Dmitry Trofimov wrote: > Hi Karen, > > r15911 does fix the problem. Thanks. > >

Re: Ticket reports page redesign

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Luke Plant wrote: > Have a look and anyone feel free to improve. For me, it has certainly > flagged up the areas we are doing well and badly as core developers, and > the areas where we shouldn't feel so bad. This looks great to me, at

Re: POST data handling bug

On 24/03/11 15:41, vkryachko wrote: > Please have a look at this bug: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15679 > I know it's not the right place to file bugs, but I think it's a > critical one, and backwards incompatible, so I don't want it to get > lost in trac. I marked it as 'regression', so

Re: Ticket reports page redesign

On 23/03/11 15:32, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Luke Plant wrote: >> It appears to me that this reports page is not nearly as useful as it >> could be, and I'm thinking of redesigning it. > > Sounds just fine for me -- I really threw together

Re: State of X-Sendfile support?

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Kristaps Kūlis wrote: > I wish to note that Nginx implements this feature differently than > LigHTTPd and Apache2 > http://wiki.nginx.org/XSendfile , > > Should django implementation consider that ? > > My proposal to implement would be:

Help wanted on a few Django community projects

Hi folks -- Lately I've been trying to think about a few ways that software might help our user and dev community as both continue to grow. I have a few things I want to try out as "spikes" (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?SpikeSolution) to see if they're really viable. I'm being deliberately vague here

POST data handling bug

Please have a look at this bug: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15679 I know it's not the right place to file bugs, but I think it's a critical one, and backwards incompatible, so I don't want it to get lost in trac. Regards. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Wrong error message when user having is_staff=False tries to login to admin

On Mar 16, 12:11 am, Tai Lee wrote: > Assuming that any authenticated user might be an attacker who has > brute forced a password and presenting obscure error messages to > authenticated users is not helping anybody. I agree with this, and with the many people in this

Re: Django urls in JavaScript

Ahh, I missed that from your original post. I like that. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: Django urls in JavaScript

That's also already done, check https://github.com/django-extensions/django-extensions/blob/master/django_extensions/management/commands/show_urls.py, it can be easily converted to JSON (I have a branch that does it, but it's not up-to-date). I also have the urls module in JavaScript already, but

Re: Django urls in JavaScript

It could just be a combo of both. There'd be one file for the urlresolver.js, and a patterns.js. Interesting. Now, could the patterns in Python be translated to Javascript properly? I'll do some playing around today and see if I can come up with some basics. Even if this doesn't land in Django

Re: Django urls in JavaScript

I think the biggest problem with translating the reverse() lookup is the lack of kwargs and named capture groups in Javascript regex. So a pattern such as: /page/(?P\d+)/ would not translate whatsoever. Then on the Javascript side, we wouldn't be able to use: reverse('goto_page', [],

Re: Django urls in JavaScript

I currently handle this issue in a much easier way: I've created an app which allows creating a context for Javascript (this basically works like the template context processors do, calling defined functions and combining its results into a dict). The resulting context will be available in the

Re: Changes in django/utils/autoreload.py breaks execution from IDE

Hi Karen, r15911 does fix the problem. Thanks. You know, people often run code from IDE without debugging. If you develope in IDE it is convenient to run code from IDE without switching to console. However you are right, that --noreload is nesessary for being able to debug. I am unsing and

Re: Django urls in JavaScript

There also proposes the problem of selecting which urls are "published" in this file and which aren't. Any ideas for that? I'm sure lots of people wouldn't want their entire sitemap exposed to the public in one large js file. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Django urls in JavaScript

I might also add the script could literally be something that is created via a management command and served via staticfiles. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: Django urls in JavaScript

"dynamic" is a bit strong, but yes. A generated js script that, based on the regex in your urlpatterns, provides functions that plug vars into url templates... so yeah! A lot of the resolving logic wouldn't (read "shouldn't") be needed so long as unique names are used for the views. -- You

Re: Django urls in JavaScript

So you're basically proposing to write a Javascript library that is a translation of URLResolver, and essentially have a dynamic "Javascript" file that could be included that would contain your URL patterns? Just trying to make sure we're on the same page. -- You received this message because

Re: Django urls in JavaScript

Somewhat incomplete thought there -- once the urlpatterns have been analyzed, the resulting chunk of generated js can be cached (where ever) and served up statically, or inline in your templates. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers"

Re: Django urls in JavaScript

Url patterns don't tend to change at runtime, right? I don't think resolving urls one by one via ajax calls is going to work. Reimplementing the resolve/reverse mechanisms in javascript - or better yet, using the "native" resolve/reverse code to generate javascript functions that take args

Re: Composite primary keys

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 02:20:41PM -0500, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Christophe Pettus wrote: > > I'd like to make one more pitch for a slightly different > > implementation here.  My concern with CompositeField isn't based > > on the fact that

Re: State of X-Sendfile support?

On 24/03/11 13:40, Kristaps Kūlis wrote: > I wish to note that Nginx implements this feature differently than > LigHTTPd and Apache2 > http://wiki.nginx.org/XSendfile , > > Should django implementation consider that ? > I'd also note that wsgi itself apparently has an api abstraction

Re: State of X-Sendfile support?

I wish to note that Nginx implements this feature differently than LigHTTPd and Apache2 http://wiki.nginx.org/XSendfile , Should django implementation consider that ? My proposal to implement would be: 1. HttpFileResponse which takes file location (relative to MEDIA_URL ?) 2. HttpFileResponse

Allow TestRunners to define their own command-line options

This idea clearly needs a design decision. The idea is to allow custom test runners do define and process their own command-line options, apart from default ones like verbose. Here's the ticket: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15675 Attached patch is one of possible solutions. Management

Re: [GSoC Proposal] Customizable Serialization

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Vivek Narayanan wrote: > Hi, > > This is my proposal for the customizable serialization idea: > > There are two formats - A formatted Google Docs version that's easy on > the eyes ( >

Re: Changes in django/utils/autoreload.py breaks execution from IDE

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:48 AM, traff wrote: > Hi guys! > > Recent commit(r15883), which fixes #15565, indeed brokes execution of > django server from IDE on UNIX platforms. > > What can be done to fix that? > > I suspect r15911 will fix it, if the problem is what I'm

Re: Changes in django/utils/autoreload.py breaks execution from IDE

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:48 PM, traff wrote: > Hi guys! > > Recent commit(r15883), which fixes #15565, indeed brokes execution of > django server from IDE on UNIX platforms. > > What can be done to fix that? Well, for starters, we'll need a clear description of the

Re: Changes in django/utils/autoreload.py breaks execution from IDE

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:48 AM, traff wrote: > Hi guys! > > Recent commit(r15883), which fixes #15565, indeed brokes execution of > django server from IDE on UNIX platforms. > > What can be done to fix that? > > Please open a ticket:

Re: Wrong error message when user having is_staff=False tries to login to admin

I have just read whole thread again and I'm happy to see there are many people supporting my proposal. They have written thorough objections to criticism. So what would be the decision on this issue? Would Django make good guys' life harder while nothing changes for bad guys? Hello.

Changes in django/utils/autoreload.py breaks execution from IDE

Hi guys! Recent commit(r15883), which fixes #15565, indeed brokes execution of django server from IDE on UNIX platforms. What can be done to fix that? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: State of X-Sendfile support?

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Paul McMillan wrote: > It's worth pointing out that manage.py runserver isn't likely to ever > support serving those files even if the header arrives in core. It's > explicitly not appropriate for any kind of production use, fallback or >

Re: Django multiple databases router(Cross-database foreign key)

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:23 PM, dy wrote: > Hi django devs, > > I have two models and need to store to different dbs.I want this field > to be a > foreign key from Test2, stored on the "test2" database, to the Test1 > model stored on the "default" database.The codes are: >

Re: Django multiple databases router(Cross-database foreign key)

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:23 AM, dy wrote: > Hi django devs, This list isn't a second level support fallback from django-users threads. It is exclusively dedicated to the discussion about development of Django*itself*. Please, keep this discussion in django-users. --

Re: [GSoC] Customizable Serialization Proposal

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:28 PM, DaNmarner wrote: > First of all: my native language is not English, so I apologize for > any potential natural language error (or any error at all) below. > > After (briefly) reading through the current implementaion as well as > the "Issues

Django multiple databases router(Cross-database foreign key)

Hi django devs, I have two models and need to store to different dbs.I want this field to be a foreign key from Test2, stored on the "test2" database, to the Test1 model stored on the "default" database.The codes are: # model in app test1,store to default class Test1(models.Model): name =