Re: Fixing makemessages for Javascript

On Thursday, April 14, 2011 12:30:56 PM UTC-4, Jannis Leidel wrote: > > On 14.04.2011, at 17:27, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > > > I think I agree with Ned here: I can't see the downside to fixing it > > on the release branch. "It violates our policy" doesn't count IMO: > > it's *our* policy, and we g

Re: Review request

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Mathieu Agopian wrote: > My turn! > > I have reviewed #15885, #15886 (then closed as duplicate), #15887, > #15891, and #15889. > > The latter, #15889 is my first code+patch+doc contribution, and i'd > like it to be reviewed please. > > Thanks! > > Mathieu > > On Ap

Re: Review request: 15064, DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE environment variable ignored in runserver.

Thanks for the info and feedback on the patches today. I'll stop spamming the list. Shawn -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this gro

Re: Review request: 15064, DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE environment variable ignored in runserver.

Hi Shawn -- FYI, we get updates to tickets sent over email (see the django-updates group) so you don't need to ping here when you've updated something -- we'll see it either way :) Jacob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To

5-1 offer

I'm pretty sure my precedent message got lost :/ I've reviewed the tickets #15833, #15885, #15886, #15887, #15891 and #15889. The latter (#15889) is my very first contribution of a patch+tests+docs, and i'd like it to be reviewed please! Thanks Mathieu

Re: Review request

My turn! I have reviewed #15885, #15886 (then closed as duplicate), #15887, #15891, and #15889. The latter, #15889 is my first code+patch+doc contribution, and i'd like it to be reviewed please. Thanks! Mathieu On Apr 22, 2:13 pm, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Ay

Review request: 15064, DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE environment variable ignored in runserver.

Patch with tests attached to ticket. http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15064 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send e

Updated patch for 15661 (LogEntry objects have no unicode method)

http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15661 Cleaned up at Jacob's suggestion. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send emai

Small doc patch for review.

http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15595 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...

Re: WSGI and multi thread

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Marco Cellarosi wrote: > Hi, > I've tried to switch my site from mod_python to mod_wsgi. > I would understand how open more process per user. > > I mean, I have an application whit Ajax call that remains in loop and every > 2 milliseconds check a file. In practical

WSGI and multi thread

Hi, I've tried to switch my site from mod_python to mod_wsgi. I would understand how open more process per user. I mean, I have an application whit Ajax call that remains in loop and every 2 milliseconds check a file. In practical, a simple while loop. If in 30 seconds it doesn't found anything,

Two small tickets, please review.

I've submitted two (very) small patches. They're my first submissions, so let the constructive criticism flow freely. I'd like to contribute to Django more than I have (mostly django-users help), so any advice that'll help me ease into the role is welcome. I've read the contribution docs, but it's

"Contributing" docs

On 22 avr. 2011, at 21:31, Gabriel Hurley wrote: > I noticed the "TODO" on the bottom of that page you linked... if you actually > want to write something up for the docs about reviewing tickets (based on the > discussion that's happened on the list the last few days) I'd suggest adding > it to

Re: "unique_together" only validated in modelform.is_valid() if ALL of the referenced fields (Ticket #13091)

Hi Carl, The issue is not only with unique_together indeed. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems there is no way currently to use model validation with fields dependent on each other when one of these fields is not POSTed directly by user. Example: # models.py class Ticket(models.Mode

Re: uWSGI documentation

> Thanks a lot Roberto and Mikhail for your feedback. > > This update includes the changes you requested, as well as more links > to uWSGI wiki: http://piratepad.net/DISxvZLCdG > > Is there any other action to take ? > > Seems very good to me, the only thing that i would really change is --home t

Re: uWSGI documentation

Thanks a lot Roberto and Mikhail for your feedback. This update includes the changes you requested, as well as more links to uWSGI wiki: http://piratepad.net/DISxvZLCdG Is there any other action to take ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django deve