[no subject]

2011-05-29 Thread Sairam Krishnamurthy
http://sjservices.com/find11.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

[GSoC form-rendering] Weekly check-in 1.0

2011-05-29 Thread Gregor Müllegger
Hi, this week was the first week with official coding for my GSoC project. I merged Bruno Renié's template based widget rendering branch in my django fork. This will be the base of my on going work. I also made sure that all tests are passing, since there were some issues with changes in the

Re: PhD ideas

2011-05-29 Thread Markus Gattol
I'd like to see Django become a bit more like Colony [0], maybe spiced up with a shoot of ZeroMQish behavior and Mongrel2 on top :-) In my opinion that would be very interesting for you, you could justify it as being worthy a PhD thesis and a lot of projects in the FLOSS community could

Re: Preventing the leaking of sensitive information in error logs

2011-05-29 Thread Yishai Beeri
On Sun, 29 May 2011 15:57:34 +0300, Fraser Nevett wrote: On May 29, 5:22 am, Julien Phalip wrote: As a side thought, if this functionality does get implemented, would it be feasible/desirable to have Django emit a warning to encourage the developer to

Re: Filtering on Many2Many Related Objects

2011-05-29 Thread Daniel Watkins
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 05:42:00PM -0700, Chris Beaven wrote: > Isn't the first suggestion (__contains) achievable already by just chaining > two filters: Group.objects.filter(persons=p1).filter(persons=p2) ? Sure, but if I want to filter on several different numbers of persons, it gets very

Re: Preventing the leaking of sensitive information in error logs

2011-05-29 Thread Fraser Nevett
On May 29, 5:22 am, Julien Phalip wrote: > I'm bringing this up to the dev-list as I'm keen to hear if someone is > interested in this problem and has suggestions towards a robust > solution. It is a pretty serious issue that I hope can be resolved by > the 1.4 release. For

Re: Fixing makemessages for Javascript

2011-05-29 Thread Jannis Leidel
On 15.04.2011, at 15:25, Ned Batchelder wrote: Hi Ned, > As you say, Jannis has suggested that a Babel-based solution isn't that much > work. But that work hasn't been done yet. I don't know how much work it is. > It's going to be a larger change to the code base than my patch is, at least