Re: Documentation for CBV's?

Victor, This is an area where I've done some work, though there is still much to do. I started with https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16807 at the sprints, and need to wrap that up. As far as an outline of modular, relatively atomic changes to the docs that would be good to see: * The

Re: Documentation for CBV's?

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Victor Hooi wrote: > Hi, > > I might be stating the obvious, but the documentation for the newer CBV's is > a little sparse: > > There's simple examples: > > https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.3/topics/class-based-views/ > > As well as a

Documentation for CBV's?

Hi, I might be stating the obvious, but the documentation for the newer CBV's is a little sparse: There's simple examples: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.3/topics/class-based-views/ As well as a generic list of mix-ins and in-built views:

Re: Proposal: drop Python 2.5 support in Django 1.5

While I agree it should be dropped, I was discussing this with the Twisted guys. They pointed out that it will actually receive security updates through 2013. This is thanks to Ubuntu 8.10 LTS. I'm sure Canonical could tap into someone like Barry to fix it if serious enough.-- Sent from my HP

Re: Proposal: drop Python 2.5 support in Django 1.5

> 2.5 is EOL and no longer receiving security patches even, it is > *irresponsible* of us to support it (I claim).  ANyways +1 This. +1 from me. We do everything else in our power to encourage secure behavior from our users, this is yet another appropriate step. -Paul -- You received this

Re: New feature: HTTP OPTIONS and improved HEAD for View

I'll probably go ahead and log it and start the patch soon. Your feedback on truncation for HTTP HEAD was helpful, and the rest doesn't seem very controversial. -- Steven On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Jamie Matthews wrote: > Just bumping this - can anyone suggest

Re: Python 3 port - all Oracle tests (bar one) now pass on 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase

On Dec 11, 6:02 pm, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > > There are also the GIS database backends in django.contrib.gis.db.backends: > postgis, spatialite, mysql, oracle. > Of course - well, I wouldn't want to have nothing to do ;-) Regards, Vinay Sajip -- You

Re: Python 3 port - all Oracle tests (bar one) now pass on 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase

On 11 déc. 2011, at 18:54, Vinay Sajip wrote: > So we now have good results on SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL and Oracle, > which I believe is all of the backends which ship with Django - have I > missed any? Hi Vinay, There are also the GIS database backends in django.contrib.gis.db.backends:

Python 3 port - all Oracle tests (bar one) now pass on 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase

I have all tests except one passing with the Oracle backend on 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase. The one failure I get (the same on 2.7 and 3.2) appears to be related to my Oracle configuration - I haven't tracked it down yet. Tests were run on Linux Mint 12 32-bit, using Oracle 10g XE

Re: Django 1.4 alpha on December 22nd

This is good news. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/-/tZW8wIV9fv0J. To post to this group, send email to

Django 1.4 alpha on December 22nd

Hey folks, We're planning to release the alpha for 1.4 on December 22nd. If you're working on non-trivial new features for 1.4, please try to make them ready for checkin by next weekend. Before you ask -- we're aiming for a beta early in February and final in March. Best regards, -- Aymeric