On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> That depends entirely on what you consider the goal of the ORM to be.
>
> You have assumed that the goal would be "allow an arbitrary query to run on
> any underlying data store, and run with equivalent efficiency". In t
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> Why? Because we've gone to extraordinary lengths to make sure this sort of
> thing is at least theoretically possible.
>
> Although we use the term "ORM", and there'
On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> Why? Because we've gone to extraordinary lengths to make sure this sort of
> thing is at least theoretically possible.
>
> Although we use the term "ORM", and there's currently only relational
> implementations of Django's
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> On Sunday, December 23, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Florent Gallaire wrote:
>
> Django ORM should work for SQL and NoSQL DBMS.
> NoSQL integration in Django is a more interesting and needed subject,
> but who cares about that in the core team ?
>
> Why
2012/9/11 Jacob Kaplan-Moss
>
> Oct 1: Feature freeze, Django 1.5 alpha.
> Nov 1: Django 1.5 beta.
> Nov 26: Django 1.5 RC 1
> Dec 10: Django 1.5 RC 2
> Dec 17: Django 1.5 RC 3, if needed
> Dec 24 (or earlier): Django 1.5 final
>
> (All dates are "week of" - we'll do the releases that week, thoug