On 02/17/2013 11:31 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote:
> It seems SQLAlchemy has a mature pooling implementation. So, yet
> another approach is to see if SQLAlchemy's pooling implementation
> could be reused. (Maybe in conjunction with the above 'POOLER' idea).
There is in fact an implementation of
Hi,
I just found ActiveAdmin, which seems to be a third-party Admin app for RoR:
http://activeadmin.info/
What are people's thoughts on this?
It seems to share quite a bit with Django's admin, but also has some nice
features:
- Inbuilt CSV/XML/JSON downloads
- Easily customizable
Hi,
you can see the tests at http://ci.djangoproject.com/ -- currently Oracle
is untested cause it's a major pita to setup on ubuntu.
Cheers,
Florian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
> Unless it fixes a release-blocking regression, it's not possible for
> this to get into either of those release branches.
That's what I thought; just checking.
> Also, generally
> we've been a bit wary of doing any kind of DB pooling at this level in
> the stack...
>
Maybe this patch
Hi, I saw a very old thread talking about setting up a buildbot for Django.
Did this ever go anywhere? Trying to run the tests against Oracle, I'm
finding some that fail against my branch and master. For instance:
ERROR: test_gfk_to_model_with_empty_pk
forgot to post the
branch: https://github.com/skyl/django/compare/7732-oracle-sessionpool
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 11:17:03 PM UTC-8, Skylar Saveland wrote:
>
> I have a branch on github if anyone is interested in taking a look. I will
> gladly modify and rebase if it's close to being
On 17 helmi, 13:24, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> **tl;dr** I believe that persistent database connections are a good idea.
> Please prove me wrong :)
>
>
>
> Since I didn't know why the idea of adding a connection pooler to Django was
>
**tl;dr** I believe that persistent database connections are a good idea.
Please prove me wrong :)
Since I didn't know why the idea of adding a connection pooler to Django was
rejected, I did some research before replying to the cx_Oracle SessionPooling
thread.
The best
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Skylar Saveland
wrote:
> I would be interested in getting this (or something like it) into 1.4.X and
> 1.5.X. Might this be possible?
Unless it fixes a release-blocking regression, it's not possible for
this to get into either of those