Re: Database pooling vs. persistent connections

2013-02-17 Thread Carl Meyer
On 02/17/2013 11:31 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > It seems SQLAlchemy has a mature pooling implementation. So, yet > another approach is to see if SQLAlchemy's pooling implementation > could be reused. (Maybe in conjunction with the above 'POOLER' idea). There is in fact an implementation of

Re: Django Admin Revamp - Any updates?

2013-02-17 Thread Victor Hooi
Hi, I just found ActiveAdmin, which seems to be a third-party Admin app for RoR: http://activeadmin.info/ What are people's thoughts on this? It seems to share quite a bit with Django's admin, but also has some nice features: - Inbuilt CSV/XML/JSON downloads - Easily customizable

Re: Is there a buildbot? Is there a waterfall? Do the tests pass against all backends?

2013-02-17 Thread Florian Apolloner
Hi, you can see the tests at http://ci.djangoproject.com/ -- currently Oracle is untested cause it's a major pita to setup on ubuntu. Cheers, Florian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: #7732 cx_Oracle SessionPool

2013-02-17 Thread Skylar Saveland
> Unless it fixes a release-blocking regression, it's not possible for > this to get into either of those release branches. That's what I thought; just checking. > Also, generally > we've been a bit wary of doing any kind of DB pooling at this level in > the stack... > Maybe this patch

Is there a buildbot? Is there a waterfall? Do the tests pass against all backends?

2013-02-17 Thread Skylar Saveland
Hi, I saw a very old thread talking about setting up a buildbot for Django. Did this ever go anywhere? Trying to run the tests against Oracle, I'm finding some that fail against my branch and master. For instance: ERROR: test_gfk_to_model_with_empty_pk

Re: #7732 cx_Oracle SessionPool

2013-02-17 Thread Skylar Saveland
forgot to post the branch: https://github.com/skyl/django/compare/7732-oracle-sessionpool On Saturday, February 16, 2013 11:17:03 PM UTC-8, Skylar Saveland wrote: > > I have a branch on github if anyone is interested in taking a look. I will > gladly modify and rebase if it's close to being

Re: Database pooling vs. persistent connections

2013-02-17 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On 17 helmi, 13:24, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > **tl;dr** I believe that persistent database connections are a good idea. > Please prove me wrong :) > > > > Since I didn't know why the idea of adding a connection pooler to Django was >

Database pooling vs. persistent connections

2013-02-17 Thread Aymeric Augustin
**tl;dr** I believe that persistent database connections are a good idea. Please prove me wrong :) Since I didn't know why the idea of adding a connection pooler to Django was rejected, I did some research before replying to the cx_Oracle SessionPooling thread. The best

Re: #7732 cx_Oracle SessionPool

2013-02-17 Thread James Bennett
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Skylar Saveland wrote: > I would be interested in getting this (or something like it) into 1.4.X and > 1.5.X. Might this be possible? Unless it fixes a release-blocking regression, it's not possible for this to get into either of those