Re: Recommending a Python 3-compatible MySQL connector

On 5 mai 2013, at 21:15, Ian Clelland wrote: > I don't object at all -- as long as the code it still passing tests, that is > :) I just installed your version of MySQL-for-Python-3 on the CI server. We'll have the results of the test runs in a few hours:

Re: Recommending a Python 3-compatible MySQL connector

> So, unless someone has a better idea, or Ian objects, I'm going to link to > his fork . I don't object at all -- as long as the code it still passing tests, that is :) It was originally developed as a proof of concept when python 3 support was

Recommending a Python 3-compatible MySQL connector

Hello, To claim first-class Python 3 support in Django 1.6, we need to recommend a MySQL connector that works. This was discussed a few times on the mailing list, now's the time to make a decision. Here's a summary of the options. Moist: https://github.com/farcepest/moist - port by

Re: Ticket 19445

Hi Luke, I'm also skeptical about validation when: - it tries to analyze statically dynamic behaviors; - it fails on code that actually works. To me it looks like the admin outgrew its own validation, and as a consequence the validation needs to be re-engineered. Christopher Medrela applied for