On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Aymeric Augustin <
aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> On 17 déc. 2013, at 20:38, Karen Tracey wrote:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/0IuJssTt8tc/TxdXQ2D0thcJ
>
>
> Interesting. Now I remember reading that
Hi all,
In implementing this I ran into a bug in the way SQLite returns column
information: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21603
It affects raw queries in general, but this feature in particular due to
the way the code generate nested SQL queries.
Cheers,
Alex
On Friday, December
On 17 déc. 2013, at 19:53, Javier Guerra Giraldez wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Aymeric Augustin
> wrote:
>> Django’s ORM is entirely designed to translate between an object oriented
>> API and SQL. That’s what its name says.
On 17 déc. 2013, at 20:38, Karen Tracey wrote:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/0IuJssTt8tc/TxdXQ2D0thcJ
Interesting. Now I remember reading that message last year. I have three
reactions.
First, Russell and I agree that the interest has faded.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> Django’s ORM is entirely designed to translate between an object oriented API
> and SQL. That’s what its name says. It achieves this through roughly five
> layers that bride the abstraction gap.
>
>
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:16:04 PM UTC-5, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
>
> Django’s ORM is entirely designed to translate between an object oriented
> API and SQL. That’s what its name says. It achieves this through roughly
> five layers that bride the abstraction gap.
>
> Django’s ORM is
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Aymeric Augustin <
aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> On 17 déc. 2013, at 19:53, Javier Guerra Giraldez
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Aymeric Augustin
> > wrote:
> >> Django’s
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Tom Evans wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:35 PM, parisrocks
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Waiting for official Django ORM support for NoSql databases.
>>
>>
>>
Hi Chris,
On 17 déc. 2013, at 17:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
> There is no particular reason NOT to do it, unless one wants Django's ORM
> layer to remain fundamentally tied to SQL.
I don’t understand your sentence. To me it’s as if you were saying “there is no
particular
Hi all,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Tom Evans wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:35 PM, parisrocks
wrote:
Waiting for official Django ORM support for NoSql databases.
MongoDB (and the vast majority of NoSQL databases) are not relational
databases, they are document
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:35 PM, parisrocks
wrote:
> Hi Django Users,
> I tried Django recently and really liked the simplistic approach for
> building sites.
> But there's no official support for NoSQL databases like Cassandra or
> MongoDB, there's a great
Hi Django Users,
I tried Django recently and really liked the simplistic approach for
building sites.
But there's no official support for NoSQL databases like Cassandra or
MongoDB, there's a great community of NoSQL users waiting for an official
ORM support from Django like me. I would say
On 16 déc. 2013, at 12:02, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> I sent a pull request implementing my first goal:
> https://github.com/django/django/pull/2076.
Merged: https://github.com/django/django/compare/fe1389e911b0...4a56a93cc458
--
Aymeric.
--
You
13 matches
Mail list logo