Re: Great Wall of DEP

On 8 mai 2014, at 16:26, Michael Manfre wrote: > It's been almost a month and the next step in the process for the first two > DEPs is to merge the PRs and assign numbers to make them "active". The > discussion for each of them can take place over the coming months. I hate

Re: Feature request: ttl method for cache

I was fixing my little helper function to behave more like Sean's and I think I've found a bug in locmem. Could you please take a look at this: >>> cache >>> cache.set('a', 1) >>> cache.set('b', 2, None) >>> cache.get('a') 1 >>> cache.get('b') 2 >>> cache.has_key('a') True >>>

Re: Great Wall of DEP

Their is some value in commenting directly on a pull-request, for example you can comment on specific lines of code, and the interface is very friendly. With that being said, having a link to related google group pages (or another mail-archive site) in the pull-request message would be a

Re: Great Wall of DEP

It's been almost a month and the next step in the process for the first two DEPs is to merge the PRs and assign numbers to make them "active". The discussion for each of them can take place over the coming months. I hate to sound so cynical, but if none of the 30+ current core developers are able

Re: Great Wall of DEP

I have to agree that the decentralized nature of the mailing list would probably stand the test of time a bit better, plus the ability to in-line reply makes larger discussions easier on the eyes. In reference to OPs original comments; Enhancement proposals are a great idea, but ultimately they

Re: Great Wall of DEP

Hi folks, Discussing DEPs on Github inside Pull Request comments seems like a really bad idea, because it excludes a whole bunch of people that are subscribed to this list (I always thought this was the sole purpose of this list). The best thing about PEPs is that they always get posted to

Re: Great Wall of DEP

Hi, On Thursday, May 8, 2014 2:13:52 PM UTC+2, Carl wrote: > > Just noticed this message, and the DEP PRs are still open a week later. > Can someone shuffle this along, please? > We are in the final stages of 1.7, I personally would rather focus on that first. -- You received this

Re: Great Wall of DEP

Hi all, > If no-one else has looked at and commented on those two DEPs within > the next day or two, I will have time to do so, and will do so (and > feel free to poke me if I haven't). Just noticed this message, and the DEP PRs are still open a week later. Can someone shuffle this along,