Hi Tobias

I think it's also worth mentioning your blog post, in which you explain (to
yourself) how to currently achieve dynamic keys:
https://rixx.de/blog/how-django-s-page-cache-works/ . It's a lot of work.

The closure of #11269 does seem like an oversight, since the
CACHE_MIDDLEWARE_KEY_PREFIX setting doesn't support dynamic prefixes.

I am in favour of allowing callable prefixes. It seems like a small feature
with great utility.

Thanks,

Adam

On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 15:37, Tobias Kunze <r...@cutebit.de> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> after mostly caching via external tools or manually for years, I've been
> trying out Django's built-in caching recently, and have ran into an issue
> that
> I believe could improve the use cases of `cache_page` a lot:
>
> `cache_page`/`CacheMiddleware` take an optional `key_prefix` argument as a
> string, falling back to `settings.CACHE_MIDDLEWARE_KEY_PREFIX`.
>
> If this argument could be a callable (getting the current request as
> argument), it would be much easier to cache different versions of the page,
> for example for users with different access rights, or to make sure newer
> changes are reflected by including a version or timestamp in the cache key.
>
> This change was proposed, uhm, 13 years ago, and was closed when the
> key_prefix became a site-wide setting. Any arguments for/against
> re-opening?
>
>   https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/11269
>
> Additionally, for several of my use cases it would have been very neat to
> be
> able to determine the cache key myself, which is currently generated fairly
> deep into the caching stack based on the prefix, the request and so on.
> While
> that's a good default, it makes it harder to interact with the cache from
> outside the request-response cycle for the view being cached.
> (But that's a bigger ask, because there's less existing infrastructure to
> pass
> down a changed key function – I'd be pretty happy with just a dynamic
> prefix.)
>
> Best,
> Tobias
> --
> Tobias Kunze / rixx (er/he)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/20220122153731.4beyiyepuahiprgu%40cordelia.localdomain
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAMyDDM1h8P%3DP9mhc9xevsdsN_QTBRmW0m_HibbufP3Dcon6mbw%40mail.gmail.com.
  • Mak... Tobias Kunze
    • ... 'Adam Johnson' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
      • ... Alexandru M.
        • ... 'Adam Johnson' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
          • ... Alexandru M.

Reply via email to