On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 11:06:43 AM UTC+1, ludovic coues wrote:
>
> I might be saying something stupid, but rather than filtering test,
> would it not be better to have a flag to rerun all the test that
> failed in the previous run ?
>
>
That's why we extende DiscoverRunner to make
t;
> W dniu piątek, 22 maja 2015 10:49:11 UTC+2 użytkownik Steve Jalim napisał:
>>
>> Amen to 3 and 3a - that's been proving one of the fiddliest aspects when
>> there are lots of migrations to squash - trial-end-error checking of how
>> many you can get away with squash
Amen to 3 and 3a - that's been proving one of the fiddliest aspects when
there are lots of migrations to squash - trial-end-error checking of how
many you can get away with squashing in one go while avoiding dependency
issues from other apps
On Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 11:08:42 AM UTC+1,
Naive / over-obvious suggestion: if there's a genuine stalemate, bundling
the changes into a third-party app that supplants core runserver (similar
to how django-devserver does it) would avoid the need for individuals to
monkey-patch while also making it possible to release versions with more
