Re: Missing timezone support in built-in time template filter

2013-08-26 Thread Warren Smith
/django/pull/1327. I'm a git newbie, so it took me a while to figure out how to remedy that. I'm not sure if that was why it was getting held up, but it is fixed now. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:19 PM, gilberto dos santos alves <gsa...@gmail.com>wrote: > well done. > > 2013/7/3 Warre

Re: Missing timezone support in built-in time template filter

2013-07-03 Thread Warren Smith
ct.com/ticket/20693 is ready for somebody to review it. It would be great if this could get into 1.6. -- Warren Smith -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re: Missing timezone support in built-in time template filter

2013-07-01 Thread Warren Smith
+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- Warren Smith --

Re: Missing timezone support in built-in time template filter

2013-06-28 Thread Warren Smith
django.utils.dateformat.TimeFormat class, similar to the way they are supported in the DateFormat class, and perhaps do some refactoring of both classes so that common methods are inherited from an additional base class. Thoughts? Either way, this is worth a ticket so that the idea/problem isn't forgot

Missing timezone support in built-in time template filter

2013-06-27 Thread Warren Smith
Is anyone aware of a reason why the built-in time template filter does not have timezone support? The built-in date template filter has timezone support, but I wanting to use the TIME_FORMAT default stuff linked to the time filter. Was timezone considered to be not relevant for the time

Re: minify static files (css and js)

2011-08-11 Thread Warren Smith
-managers/ I'm not sure how current this information is, but it is very informative nonetheless. They all seem to have their strengths and weaknesses. I guess the choice depends on which functionality is important to you. -- Warren Smith -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: #6735 -- Class based generic views: call for comment

2010-10-04 Thread Warren Smith
lution is > fine, just don't force me to pass everything around as arguments between > functions. That's not looking likely, but some people here seen to want to > have that kind of purity at the expense of usability - dammit, Jim, I'm an > engineer, not a mathematician. > > +1 -

Re: Multi-credential ORM configuration support

2009-11-13 Thread Warren Smith
solution to a relatively simple logic problem. Would it make sense to factor out the connection selection logic into a utility function with parameters that make it usable in all contexts, thus yielding a single place to inject the check for the request-specific default db alias (and perhaps o

Re: Multi-credential ORM configuration support

2009-11-12 Thread Warren Smith
>We'd certainly be interested in any > input on ways to improve usability for the multi-credential case. > Excellent. I'll do some experimentation and attempt to come up with some recommendations. Thanks. Your brief consideration of this is exactly what I am seeking. -- Warren Smith --

Multi-credential ORM configuration support

2009-11-11 Thread Warren Smith
branch have any bearing on this use case? -- Warren Smith --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@google

Re: Posting to the wrong list (was: Re: Need Django Developer urgent)

2009-05-08 Thread Warren Smith
""" Discussion group for issues regarding the development of the Django framework itself. For discussion of issues that involve the entire Django community, including using the framework to develop applications, please use django-users. """ Just my $.02 -- War