The single piece of Django that I'm most hungry for right now is the
bit that pushes translated strings up into your javascript.
If it's feasible to use just that bit, and keep my own connection
paradigm, it could be a short-term solution.
Thanks again all for your time and energy on this
> well. Sure, someone mentioned the possability of some money for
> development, but that doesn't cover the long term maintianence, which is
> what the core devs are looking for.
If someone is offering to pay for development of a feature that will
enable them to use the framework for their
m, Vinay Sajip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 10, 7:37 am, foobarmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1. RDBMSs like PostgreSQL, Oracle, perhaps even MySQL although it's
> > still a fledgling in this regard (to name but 3), were designed to (or
> > have subseq
t; when you invent an idiot-proof system, the world will compensate by
> producing more advanced idiots.
Funny, but getting back to the argument, DBAs are not idiots. The
DBA's job in the organisation is to make the database run smoothly.
On May 10, 3:23 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL P
Perhaps I should have given more specific info about the project.
It's not a CMS, or one of these "happy apps" that just have a database
because it's cool to have one.
It's a tightly modelled, configurable, business administration tool.
If used in a business of significant size, I would expect
I'm managing a programming team that's developing a web app in python.
I'd like to be using Django but can't at the moment because one of the
things we are doing is driving the application user into the database
connection, so that we can implement access control at database level.
I would like
