Re: Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

2013-05-22 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On 23 touko, 06:53, Donald Stufft wrote: > So I just submitted a PR for the pre_syncdb > signal:https://github.com/django/django/pull/1200 > > After I get an eye or two on it, assuming no one has any issues with it I'll > merge it. Minor error in docs spotted, otherwise looks

Re: Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

2013-05-22 Thread Donald Stufft
On May 21, 2013, at 12:11 PM, peter wrote: > +1 on pre_syncdb > > On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:29:49 AM UTC-7, Shai Berger wrote: > On Tuesday 21 May 2013, Donald Stufft wrote: > > I run migrations in test. How else will you know your db reflects reality > > :/ > > >

Re: Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

2013-05-21 Thread peter
+1 on pre_syncdb On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:29:49 AM UTC-7, Shai Berger wrote: > > On Tuesday 21 May 2013, Donald Stufft wrote: > > I run migrations in test. How else will you know your db reflects > reality > > :/ > > > > When you have a few hundred migrations, that's something you're

Re: Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

2013-05-21 Thread Shai Berger
On Tuesday 21 May 2013, Donald Stufft wrote: > I run migrations in test. How else will you know your db reflects reality > :/ > When you have a few hundred migrations, that's something you're willing to do in your CI server, but not on your development machine. Shai. -- You received this

Re: Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

2013-05-21 Thread Donald Stufft
I run migrations in test. How else will you know your db reflects reality :/ On May 20, 2013, at 10:58 AM, charettes wrote: > This makes me wonder if you're planing to introduce a `SOUTH_TEST_MIGRATE` > setting analog when moving migration handling to core. > > I think

Re: Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

2013-05-21 Thread charettes
This makes me wonder if you're planing to introduce a `SOUTH_TEST_MIGRATE` setting analog when moving migration handling to core. I think most people with a huge south migration history will set this setting to `False` to speedup testsuite execution and thus they couldn't be used for database

Re: Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

2013-05-20 Thread Andrew Godwin
Of course, the long-term solution for this is probably migrations. The post_syncdb signal already causes me problems - as there's no good definition for it with migrations around (you basically have to send it right at the end for every model you think you touched). However, the patch Donald

Re: Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

2013-05-18 Thread Donald Stufft
There's already a patch on the ticket tracker for a pre_syncdb signal, and yesterday I started updating it and modifying it a bit as I needed this signal. https://github.com/dstufft/django/compare/pre-syncdb-signal On May 18, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Karol Sikora wrote: > I can

Re: Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

2013-05-18 Thread Karol Sikora
I can try to implement approach with pre_syncdb signal tomorrow. I think that is quite enough solution before deeper diggling into new migrations framework. Karol 18 maj 2013 19:03, "Anssi Kääriäinen" napisał(a): > On 16 touko, 11:20, Danilo Bargen

Re: Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

2013-05-18 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On 16 touko, 11:20, Danilo Bargen wrote: > As a sidenote, there was a discussion about this on this mailing list a few > months ago: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/django-developers/16550/dj... I think a pre_sync signal is best approach. The signal should be

Re: Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

2013-05-16 Thread Danilo Bargen
As a sidenote, there was a discussion about this on this mailing list a few months ago: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/django-developers/16550/django-developers/xN0aMzrmA1Y/KsrsEf7XOA8J -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django

Re: Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

2013-05-15 Thread Donald Stufft
On May 15, 2013, at 9:01 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > Hi folks -- > > Does anyone have some clever thoughts on how to solve #16650? > > https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16550#comment:7 is a good > summary of the problem: if you're using extensions, you need a way to

Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

2013-05-15 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Hi folks -- Does anyone have some clever thoughts on how to solve #16650? https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16550#comment:7 is a good summary of the problem: if you're using extensions, you need a way to run some custom SQL in tests after the DB gets created by the test harness but before