Personally I don’t think we should prompt the user for anything. If the user
gives the username and password in the url (user:pass@host) then we can use
that, otherwise we just throw an error.
A more complicated solution involving making a request, detecting a 401,
prompting the user and retry
I also think this is feature creep and if it's a complicated change it's
not worth it.
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 18:36, Tim Graham wrote:
> I'd like to see what your code looks like so far. Personally, this is
> sounding a lot more complicated than I imagined when I accepted the ticket.
> I doubt th
My solution for the basic auth problem would be something like this
Tim Graham ezt írta (időpont: 2021. márc. 4., Cs,
19:36):
> I'd like to see what your code looks like so far. Personally, this is
> sounding a lot more complicated than I imagined when I accepted the ticket.
> I doubt this is a
I'd like to see what your code looks like so far. Personally, this is
sounding a lot more complicated than I imagined when I accepted the ticket.
I doubt this is a highly requested feature that couldn't be solved another
way (e.g. downloading the template file without Django), and It's not clear
Thanks for the fast reply
I found these test cases but I am not sure how to extend them with basic
auth, because I don't know if the *LiveServerTestCase *is capable of doing
basic auth. As I see currently there is no testcase checking basic auth
here and it has to be checked by hand.
I am sorry b
Hi Bence, welcome!
There are already a couple of tests in place to check the remove fetching:
https://github.com/django/django/blob/05bbff82638731a6abfed2fe0ae06a4d429cb32f/tests/admin_scripts/tests.py#L2047-L2072
Without changing the command code I'd first add view (in
admin_scripts/urls.py
Hi,
I would like to work on this ticket
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28426. I am fairly new in the
community and to Django development as well but this ticket seems not so
Django specific and I am confident I can implement it. I have done some
research already and found that we need to im
