On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Collin Grady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SmileyChris said the following:
>
> > You were using a new feature (albeit the wrong one) so that's not
> > really a backwards incompatible issue, is it?
>
> The old ObjectPaginator class is going away though, isn't
SmileyChris said the following:
> You were using a new feature (albeit the wrong one) so that's not
> really a backwards incompatible issue, is it?
The old ObjectPaginator class is going away though, isn't it? That sounds
like backwards incompatible to me ;)
--
Collin Grady
Computer
Well it's deprecated. If nothing else, can we have a "OMGBIGCHANGES"
wiki page? :)
In regards to features. I could make quite a few suggestions for the
paginator based on my use-cases at Curse and other projects. The new
one is a big improvement, but I find that I still can't use it without
You were using a new feature (albeit the wrong one) so that's not
really a backwards incompatible issue, is it?
On May 6, 1:55 pm, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone add it to the BackwardsIncompatibeChanges page?
>
> I saw the warning, and briefly skimmed over the page and
Can someone add it to the BackwardsIncompatibeChanges page?
I saw the warning, and briefly skimmed over the page and switched to
Paginator. To my suprise, there was a little clause at the bottom
saying "USE QUERYSETPAGINATOR" which I didn't notice. You can guess
what I was thinking when I saw it
