On 6/10/07, Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Had a nice funny rant typed up related to the general lack of code
> efficiency in template code (ticket 4523 is an example) [... snip]
Just a heads-up to you and anyone else who notices stuff like this:
Performance is near and dear to me, a
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:05:01PM -, SmileyChris wrote:
>
> On Jun 9, 9:32 am, Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Realize it's hit trunk already,
> No worries, we can always open another ticket :)
Already watching enough tickets ;)
> > but noticed an annoying potential
> > gotcha
On Jun 9, 9:32 am, Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Realize it's hit trunk already,
No worries, we can always open another ticket :)
> but noticed an annoying potential
> gotcha- for single var in a for loop, any changes to the context stay
> put- for multiple vars, the context gets wip
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:53:07PM +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> On 6/6/07, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > New patch uploaded, taking into account Brian's thoughts (and fixing a
> > small bug):
> >
> > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3523#comment:11
>
> Ok; I've had a
On Jun 8, 12:57 pm, "Michael Trier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This looks really cool. Thanks SmileyChris.
And Honza for the initial work on this ticket :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django
This looks really cool. Thanks SmileyChris.
Michael
On 6/7/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 6/7/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/7/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Unless there are any objections, I'm happy to check this into
On 6/7/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unless there are any objections, I'm happy to check this into trunk.
>
> Meh, I'm barely +0, but don't let my apathy stop you :)
+0 from me, too. Go for it, if you'd like.
Adri
On 6/7/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless there are any objections, I'm happy to check this into trunk.
Meh, I'm barely +0, but don't let my apathy stop you :)
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscrib
On 6/6/07, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> New patch uploaded, taking into account Brian's thoughts (and fixing a
> small bug):
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3523#comment:11
Ok; I've had a chance to look at this now. I've made a couple of minor
modifications, mostly in docs,
New patch uploaded, taking into account Brian's thoughts (and fixing a
small bug):
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3523#comment:11
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To
On Jun 5, 11:48 pm, Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comments on the patch/syntax at least; Offhand, test
> 'for-tag-unpack03' points out some uglyness in the api-
>
> {% for key value in items %}
> {{ key }}:{{ value }}/
> {% endfor %}
Regarding the whole comma/space issue, t
Personally, I'd like the patch to go in; the support is far easier on
the eyes reading wise, and it has the nice side affect of speeding up
the access- index access is last in the chain for var resolution,
meaning several pricey exceptions/tests occur every access.
Faster resolution, and cleane
On 6/5/07, David Larlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2007/6/5, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Ticket http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3523 has been sitting
> > quietly for a couple of months as a design decision and it's a
> > reasonably common question in the IRC channel so I thou
2007/6/5, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Ticket http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3523 has been sitting
> quietly for a couple of months as a design decision and it's a
> reasonably common question in the IRC channel so I thought I'd ask a
> core developer for a decision.
>
I'm not a cor
Ticket http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3523 has been sitting
quietly for a couple of months as a design decision and it's a
reasonably common question in the IRC channel so I thought I'd ask a
core developer for a decision.
The ticket itself relies on a change to context.update, which is
pro
15 matches
Mail list logo
