On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:33:45 -0500, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
wrote:
> That's more or less how I look at things, with one additional caveat:
Thanks for the clarification, Jacob.
Kind regards
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Michael Radziej wrote:
> If the bug is really bad or the fix looks simple, fix the bug. Else,
> close it as duplicate, but keep the tickets consistent for the users and
> promote the feature request to a bug ticket.
>
> Is this OK for you?
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:16:50 -0400, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Did you link the wrong ticket? Jacob doesn't appear to have ever commented
> on it.
Args, yeah.
Ticket #15740 is the right one ...
Sorry
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Michael Radziej wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to review ticket #10899, which is about a small bug in the
> test client. The reporter also provided a simple patch and a regression
> test.
>
> There's also a 2 years old feature request ticket that
Hi,
I'm trying to review ticket #10899, which is about a small bug in the
test client. The reporter also provided a simple patch and a regression test.
There's also a 2 years old feature request ticket that is about the same
area, and implementing the feature would also fix the bug. So Jacob