Re: Policy for Duplicate Tickets - Bug vs. Feature Request

2011-04-22 Thread Michael Radziej
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:33:45 -0500, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > That's more or less how I look at things, with one additional caveat: Thanks for the clarification, Jacob. Kind regards Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Policy for Duplicate Tickets - Bug vs. Feature Request

2011-04-21 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Michael Radziej wrote: > If the bug is really bad or the fix looks simple, fix the bug. Else, > close it as duplicate, but keep the tickets consistent for the users and > promote the feature request to a bug ticket. > > Is this OK for you?

Re: Policy for Duplicate Tickets - Bug vs. Feature Request

2011-04-21 Thread Michael Radziej
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:16:50 -0400, Alex Gaynor wrote: > Did you link the wrong ticket? Jacob doesn't appear to have ever commented > on it. Args, yeah. Ticket #15740 is the right one ... Sorry Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Policy for Duplicate Tickets - Bug vs. Feature Request

2011-04-21 Thread Alex Gaynor
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Michael Radziej wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to review ticket #10899, which is about a small bug in the > test client. The reporter also provided a simple patch and a regression > test. > > There's also a 2 years old feature request ticket that

Policy for Duplicate Tickets - Bug vs. Feature Request

2011-04-21 Thread Michael Radziej
Hi, I'm trying to review ticket #10899, which is about a small bug in the test client. The reporter also provided a simple patch and a regression test. There's also a 2 years old feature request ticket that is about the same area, and implementing the feature would also fix the bug. So Jacob