2007/1/30, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 1/30/07, David Larlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm +1 on this option. Before making decision what about at least add
> > a warning message on the documentation page?
>
> This is kind of the point. Which documentation page? Generic
On 30/01/07, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1/29/07, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know that you need to make a release for this fix, but I think you
> > should alert people to it. There is a mailing list for announcing releases
> > and security issues,
2007/1/29, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 1/29/07, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know that you need to make a release for this fix, but I think you
> > should alert people to it. There is a mailing list for announcing releases
> > and security issues, right?
On 1/29/07, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know that you need to make a release for this fix, but I think you
> should alert people to it. There is a mailing list for announcing releases
> and security issues, right? You should send a message to that list
> announcing the
I think it is risky to assume that all potentially affected users will
see this information in this thread. I found it, but there was an
element of luck involved. I don't read this list religiously, and could
easily have missed it.
I don't know that you need to make a release for this fix,
On 1/23/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/23/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've just attached a unit test to the ticket. It seems to be the same
> > issue described in #2749 and #3081. I think I understand the problem;
> > the patch on #3081 is
On 1/23/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've just attached a unit test to the ticket. It seems to be the same
> issue described in #2749 and #3081. I think I understand the problem;
> the patch on #3081 is pretty much correct. I should have this sorted
> out by tonight.
>
On 1/23/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/23/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Could somebody provide some unit tests that isolate the problem? I've
> > never mucked with the GenericForeignKey code -- perhaps Jacob or
> > Russell could chime in here
On 1/23/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could somebody provide some unit tests that isolate the problem? I've
> never mucked with the GenericForeignKey code -- perhaps Jacob or
> Russell could chime in here for the fix?
I've never really played with GenericRelations, so I
On 1/22/07, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Deletion of objects with a GenericRelation(X) deletes unrelated X
> objects with the same object_id!
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3215
>
> This ticket needs developers focus sooner rather than later. The
> implications of this patch
10 matches
Mail list logo
