Re: WSGI support in Django

2010-01-06 Thread Evert Carton
, 5 January, 2010 0:44:57 Subject: Re: WSGI support in Django On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Gustavo Narea wrote: > Hi, > > One more update about the WSGI related improvements for Django: > > I have created a Mercurial branch to keep track of these changes and > keep them sync

Re: WSGI support in Django

2010-01-04 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Gustavo Narea wrote: > Hi, > > One more update about the WSGI related improvements for Django: > > I have created a Mercurial branch to keep track of these changes and > keep them synchronized with trunk: > http://bitbucket.org/Gustavo/django-wsgi/ > > Even though

Re: WSGI support in Django

2010-01-04 Thread Gustavo Narea
Hi, One more update about the WSGI related improvements for Django: I have created a Mercurial branch to keep track of these changes and keep them synchronized with trunk: http://bitbucket.org/Gustavo/django-wsgi/ Even though I know it's late for 1.2 at this point, please keep in mind that part

Re: WSGI support in Django

2009-10-28 Thread Gustavo Narea
Hello again, The features implemented in the patches are very important for us, so I'd be more than happy to help with the development of v1.2 so you can have more time to review these three patches. We don't want to affect the development of Django 1.2, but at the same time we'd really prefer t

Re: WSGI support in Django

2009-10-28 Thread Gustavo Narea
Hello, Russell. OK, I see what you mean, it sounds sensible. Then I'd really appreciate if a core developer could take a look into this. I think the advantages are very important, we're talking about making Django more interoperable with other applications, and it'd require little effort on your

Re: WSGI support in Django

2009-10-27 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Gustavo Narea wrote: > > Hi there. > > Over the last week I've been working to improve WSGI support in Django > and I have sent a few patches which have not received the feedback I > expected to have, so I wanted to ping you. ;-) In the interests of good communi