Re: django.utils.version.get_version() discrepancy for Python 2 vs. Python 3

Considering the information provided by Donald, it’s pretty clear to me that we should switch to rc as proposed by Tim. -- Aymeric. > On 18 nov. 2015, at 01:26, Tim Graham wrote: > > Thanks Donald, updating setuptools was the factor I missed, not Python 2 vs. > 3. >

Re: django.utils.version.get_version() discrepancy for Python 2 vs. Python 3

Thanks Donald, updating setuptools was the factor I missed, not Python 2 vs. 3. On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 5:06:59 PM UTC-5, Donald Stufft wrote: > > > On Nov 17, 2015, at 12:00 PM, Tim Graham > wrote: > > There was a small hiccup with the 1.9 release candidate

Re: django.utils.version.get_version() discrepancy for Python 2 vs. Python 3

> On Nov 17, 2015, at 12:00 PM, Tim Graham wrote: > > There was a small hiccup with the 1.9 release candidate yesterday. Unless > there is some other conflating factor that I missed, generating release > packages using Python 2 will yield a name like

Re: django.utils.version.get_version() discrepancy for Python 2 vs. Python 3

> On Nov 17, 2015, at 3:03 PM, Aymeric Augustin > wrote: > > On 17 nov. 2015, at 18:00, Tim Graham > wrote: > >> Do you think it's correct to make the change in Django itself? >>

Re: django.utils.version.get_version() discrepancy for Python 2 vs. Python 3

On 17 nov. 2015, at 18:00, Tim Graham wrote: > Do you think it's correct to make the change in Django itself? > https://github.com/django/django/pull/5676 > -- I didn't track down the > reason why this changed in Python.