Re: Should we backport adding support for psycopg2 2.8 to the 1.11.x and 2.1.x?

Django 2.0 is no longer supported. W dniu sobota, 6 kwietnia 2019 18:52:21 UTC+2 użytkownik Uri Even-Chen napisał: > > Don't forget 2.0. > > I updated my project to use psycopg2==2.7.7 until we upgrade to Django 2.2. > > אורי > u...@speedy.net > -- You received this message because you are sub

Re: Should we backport adding support for psycopg2 2.8 to the 1.11.x and 2.1.x?

Don't forget 2.0. I updated my project to use psycopg2==2.7.7 until we upgrade to Django 2.2. אורי u...@speedy.net On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:35 PM Mariusz Felisiak wrote: > Agreed. I will document that 1.11 and 2.1 require psycopg2 *2.5.4* through > *2.7.7* versions. > > We can re-open this d

Re: Should we backport adding support for psycopg2 2.8 to the 1.11.x and 2.1.x?

Agreed. I will document that 1.11 and 2.1 require psycopg2 *2.5.4* through *2.7.7* versions. We can re-open this discussion in the future if e.g. psycopg2 2.8.x will contain some important security patch. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django dev

Re: Should we backport adding support for psycopg2 2.8 to the 1.11.x and 2.1.x?

OK, so for me, this should go into v2.2, but not v2.1 or v1.11. (I see you already backported to 2.2 so... 🙂) My general take here is that we could be half-a-notch more generous backporting to the current version (e.g. 2.2 now) but should be just as strict as we are once a version is out of mai

Re: Should we backport adding support for psycopg2 2.8 to the 1.11.x and 2.1.x?

The only difference is that backporting the fix has some risk of regression. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: Should we backport adding support for psycopg2 2.8 to the 1.11.x and 2.1.x?

I'd say backport it. The 1.11 docs say to install 2.5.4 or higher ( https://github.com/django/django/blob/stable/1.11.x/docs/ref/databases.txt#L95 ). So either you backport the fix or edit the old docs to say <2.8, which is just as much work? On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 13:52, Mariusz Felisiak wrote:

Should we backport adding support for psycopg2 2.8 to the 1.11.x and 2.1.x?

Patch for adding support for psycopg2 *2.8* is ready (see ticket #30331 and PR11171 ). Fix is quite straightforward and works with all supported version of psycopg2, i.e. *2.5.4+*. The question is, should