On Sunday 15 June 2014 10:59:17 Michael Manfre wrote:
> I don't see how it should be up to Django to continue to support all of
> these archaic versions of Oracle. To paraphrase the mantra repeated during
> various mssql discussions, "Django doesn't need to include everything in
> core, it just nee
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Michael Manfre wrote:
> I don't see how it should be up to Django to continue to support all of
> these archaic versions of Oracle. To paraphrase the mantra repeated during
> various mssql discussions, "Django doesn't need to include everything in
> core, it just n
I don't see how it should be up to Django to continue to support all of
these archaic versions of Oracle. To paraphrase the mantra repeated during
various mssql discussions, "Django doesn't need to include everything in
core, it just needs to make it possible for others to implement". If people
fee
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Russell Keith-Magee <
russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Shai Berger wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> TL;DR -- ...sorry, there's no TL;DR here. It's a bunch of separate ideas.
>> It's
>> a little lengthy. Please bear with me.
>>
>> I'd
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Shai Berger > wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> TL;DR -- ...sorry, there's no TL;DR here. It's a bunch of separate ideas.
> It's
> a little lengthy. Please bear with me.
>
> I'd like to compare our support for old database servers with our support
> for old browsers. We only r
Hi guys,
TL;DR -- ...sorry, there's no TL;DR here. It's a bunch of separate ideas. It's
a little lengthy. Please bear with me.
I'd like to compare our support for old database servers with our support
for old browsers. We only recently dropped code that supported IE 6/7 (!)
for a security (!) fix