Hi Russell and Jim,
On 07/06/2011 05:34 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Jim D. wrote:
>> * There's a DB feature can_defer_constraint_checks . I couldn't find much
>> by way of documentation or or usage of this feature. But I was trying to
If you aren't using InnoDB, then it probably doesn't matter if you turn
foreign key checks on or off: it becomes a no-op. There are some other
storage engines that support transactions, and some of them might "do the
right thing" with respect to deferred foreign key checks, but I think it
does no
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Jim D. wrote:
> Are any core devs interested in taking a closer look at the current patch on
> this ticket (https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3615)? It's been through
> several rounds of revision after discussion here and on the ticket
Are any core devs interested in taking a closer look at the current patch on
this ticket (https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3615)? It's been through
several rounds of revision after discussion here and on the ticket comment
thread.
As of right now the patch should apply cleanly and pass
Karen Tracey ha scritto:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Jim Dalton > wrote:
I have not had time to try out the patch, but did look at it.
Doesn't the base implementation of disable_foreign_key_checks
need to return False
On Jun 28, 12:24 am, "Jim D." wrote:
> I spent some time last week and over the weekend nailing down a
> solution forhttps://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3615. This is the
> ticket about allowing forward references when loading data on the
> MySQL InnoDB backend. My patch
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Jim D. wrote:
>> I spent some time last week and over the weekend nailing down a
>> solution for https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3615 . This is the
>>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Jim Dalton wrote:
> "In fact, even functions without a return statement do return a value,
> albeit a rather boring one. This value is called None (it’s a built-in
> name). Writing the value None is normally suppressed by the interpreter if
Ah, that makes perfect sense now. It's the same principle when doing a .sql
import, you disable foreign_key_checks, import, then enable.
Thanks for explaining this!
Cal
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Jim Dalton wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2011, at 6:29 AM, Cal Leeming
On Jun 28, 2011, at 6:29 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] wrote:
> Sorry for the noobish question but, could someone explain the definition of
> "forward references"?? Is this a MySQL or a django term?? Google wasn't very
> forthcoming :X
Jacob actually requested that I add a note in the
On Jun 28, 2011, at 6:25 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> It actually doesn't *need* to return False; pass is the same as not returning
> anything or returning None. The boolean check just treats it the same way as
> False. "Should it?" is another question. On the one hand it's a bit more
> clear,
Sorry for the noobish question but, could someone explain the definition of
"forward references"?? Is this a MySQL or a django term?? Google wasn't very
forthcoming :X
Thanks
Cal
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Jim D. wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I spent some time last week
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Jim Dalton wrote:
>
> I have not had time to try out the patch, but did look at it. Doesn't the
> base implementation of disable_foreign_key_checks need to return False
> instead of just passing? The return value is used in loaddata
On Jun 28, 2011, at 5:27 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> Also, though I don't have MySQL 4 handy to test on, I'd be astonished if
> there were any issue there compared to MySQL 5. The set foreign_key_check
> command is certainly supported in MySLQ 4 and the select being issued to do
> the check is
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Jim D. wrote:
> My thinking at this point would be the performance is "good enough" for the
> scope of the current ticket, and that if better performance were required or
> desired, that could be facilitated under a separate ticket,
On Monday, June 27, 2011 7:04:09 PM UTC-7, Jim D. wrote:
So that caveat aside, I will try later to find a large data set I can run
> the query on to get an idea of what kind of performance hit the check
> entails. If anyone else has a large data set with two related tables, you
> can try it
On Jun 27, 2011, at 5:44 PM, Michael Blume wrote:
> I see a variable saved_objects being written, but I don't see it being
> accessed -- is this to ease future features, or am I missing a code path?
Thanks good catch. This was a remnant from an earlier iteration of this patch,
in which I tried
Couple questions:
I see a variable saved_objects being written, but I don't see it being
accessed -- is this to ease future features, or am I missing a code path?
If I'm reading correctly, check_for_invalid_foreign_keys extends over all
the rows in a table. loaddata is called by syncdb and
On Jun 27, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> Unfortunately, not much. Your test has validated that the extra code
> doesn't break anything under MyISAM, and this is certainly useful.
> However, the root problem only exists with InnoDB because of its...
> eclectic... implementation of
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Michael Blume wrote:
> Just reloaded all our fixtures, and this seems to create no regressions with
> MySQL Server version: 5.0.51a-3ubuntu5.5 (Ubuntu)
> Most of our tables are backed by MyISAM, though, so I'm not sure how much
> this helps.
Just reloaded all our fixtures, and this seems to create no regressions with
MySQL Server version: 5.0.51a-3ubuntu5.5 (Ubuntu)
Most of our tables are backed by MyISAM, though, so I'm not sure how much
this helps.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Michael Blume wrote:
>
nitpick: I got a few complaints about trailing whitespace when I applied:
/home/mike/sqlpatch.diff:36: trailing whitespace.
/home/mike/sqlpatch.diff:42: trailing whitespace.
/home/mike/sqlpatch.diff:126: trailing whitespace.
/home/mike/sqlpatch.diff:148: trailing whitespace.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Jim D. wrote:
> Does it work in production is a hard question for me to answer, if I
> understood your question properly. In my projects, I really only touch the
> loaddata command when I'm running tests (I guess loading data via
>
On Monday, June 27, 2011 3:08:03 PM UTC-7, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>
> I left some comments on the patch on the ticket.
>
Excellent just saw those. I'll take a look.
> > I'm using django-threadedcomments on a project, which has forward
> > references in one of its test fixtures, so I'm
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Jim D. wrote:
> I spent some time last week and over the weekend nailing down a
> solution for https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3615 . This is the
> ticket about allowing forward references when loading data on the
> MySQL InnoDB
Hi all,
I spent some time last week and over the weekend nailing down a
solution for https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3615 . This is the
ticket about allowing forward references when loading data on the
MySQL InnoDB backend. My patch implements the proposed change
(disabling foreign key
26 matches
Mail list logo