Re: django.utils.simplejson + stdlib json

This problem was gonna have to be eventually sorted through no matter what: the endgame was decided to be "json from the standard library everywhere" which means any projects doing simplejson.dumps([django internals]) would inevitably be affected sooner or later. In theory it's just as distasteful

Re: django.utils.simplejson + stdlib json

On 13 avr. 2013, at 22:13, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > After reading that ticket, I'm not sure what Alex and I are > disagreeing on. I was suggesting using django.utils.simplejson > internally until it's removed, so that at least people could be > consistent with django itself.

Re: django.utils.simplejson + stdlib json

After reading that ticket, I'm not sure what Alex and I are disagreeing on. I was suggesting using django.utils.simplejson internally until it's removed, so that at least people could be consistent with django itself. That way, DjangoJSONEncoder would be a simplejson.JSONEncoder (if simplejson

Re: django.utils.simplejson + stdlib json

Yes, sorry, am mobile right now. Thanks Mr Ogier. :) On Apr 11, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Alex Ogier wrote: > I think what he is saying is that many third-party libraries call the > equivalent of django.utils.simplejson.dumps("...", > cls=DjangoJSONEncoder) which, despite

Re: django.utils.simplejson + stdlib json

I think what he is saying is that many third-party libraries call the equivalent of django.utils.simplejson.dumps("...", cls=DjangoJSONEncoder) which, despite django.utils.simplejson only being in a pending deprecation state, is broken. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Alex Gaynor

Re: django.utils.simplejson + stdlib json

When doing what? What do I need to do to trigger this? Alex On Apr 11, 2013 6:16 PM, "Jeremy Dunck" wrote: > If a user of django has simplejson installed, django itself will use both > the stdlib and simplejson. > > On Apr 11, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Alex Gaynor

Re: django.utils.simplejson + stdlib json

If a user of django has simplejson installed, django itself will use both the stdlib and simplejson. On Apr 11, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote: > I basically agree with what Bob said on the ticket, it's unclear to me from > your email how this manifests, other

Re: django.utils.simplejson + stdlib json

I basically agree with what Bob said on the ticket, it's unclear to me from your email how this manifests, other than trying to use something from the standard library with simplejson, which is obviously wrong. Alex On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > I've

django.utils.simplejson + stdlib json

I've just seen a documented example of this breaking things in the wild. https://github.com/simplejson/simplejson/issues/37 I think we broke backwards-compat here - django 1.5.1. plus sentry 5.4.5 dies because django's own DjangoJSONEncoder depends on stdlib json, but sentry (and lots of things)