On 14/11/12 03:43, Justin Holmes wrote:
> My only concern is that we'll limit our audience by requiring users to
> use a specific STATICFILES_STORAGE. What if they're already using a
> custom one?
One solution is to have your own COLDBREW_STATICFILES_STORAGE_BACKEND
setting, which can be used
On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Justin Holmes wrote:
>
> My only concern is that we'll limit our audience by requiring users to use a
> specific STATICFILES_STORAGE. What if they're already using a custom one?
Put the meat of your backend in a mixin, provide options for the default
Ptone: Coldbrew already uses a templatetag for development, but for
production, we want people to be able to have the collectstatic experience
and simple find collected coffee as compiled JS in their static directories.
As you suggest, I have reluctance about Bruno's solution. Also, I'd be
On 11.11.2012, at 17:09, Justin Holmes wrote:
> My sense is that there are a growing number of use cases, but the one that I
> currently have in mind is for django-coldbrew. I want to be able to
> compile all the coffeescript in a project during the collectstatic
On Sunday, November 11, 2012 8:09:23 AM UTC-8, Justin Holmes wrote:
>
> My sense is that there are a growing number of use cases, but the one that
> I currently have in mind is for django-coldbrew. I want to be able to
> compile all the coffeescript in a project during the collectstatic
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Justin Holmes wrote:
> My sense is that there are a growing number of use cases, but the one that I
> currently have in mind is for django-coldbrew. I want to be able to
> compile all the coffeescript in a project during the
My sense is that there are a growing number of use cases, but the one that
I currently have in mind is for django-coldbrew. I want to be able to
compile all the coffeescript in a project during the collectstatic
process. Currently, we have a management command, "collect_coldbrew" - but
I'd
What's the use case?
Alex
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Justin Holmes wrote:
> Currently, our only built-in management signal is post-syncdb.
>
> I propose (and, notwithstanding objection, will build)
> post-collectstatic.
>
> Is this reasonable? Is there another,
Currently, our only built-in management signal is post-syncdb.
I propose (and, notwithstanding objection, will build) post-collectstatic.
Is this reasonable? Is there another, less invasive way to hook logic into
collectstatic?
--
Justin Holmes
Chief Chocobo Breeder, slashRoot
slashRoot: