Re: robust_apply, signal refactoring and #6857

2008-03-24 Thread Leo Soto M.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Leo Soto M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > > On the other hand, all this gymnastic is done to allow receivers which > > do not conform to the full API of a signal (i.e., does

Re: robust_apply, signal refactoring and #6857

2008-03-24 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Leo Soto M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > On the other hand, all this gymnastic is done to allow receivers which > do not conform to the full API of a signal (i.e., does not accept all > signal arguments). What is the real reason behind this? Signal >