On 26 kesä, 08:41, Steven Cummings wrote:
> Sorry for chiming in so late. I very much like the goals of this effort,
> particularly bringing clarity to some of the internal APIs. Some related
> points for your consideration:
No problem. I have been so busy lately that I haven't gotten a single
co
> default deserialized_value don't returns anything. It sets the field
value.
Cool, that's exactly what I meant.
> but declaring function only to say "do nothing" isn't good solution for
me.
Declaring a method to simply 'pass' seems fine to me if you want to
override it to do nothing.
> It
I create my own slightly changed cache middleware (replace get_full_path to
build_absolute_uri)
http://macrotoma.blogspot.com/2012/06/custom-multisite-caching-on-django.html
четверг, 19 ноября 2009 г., 13:16:52 UTC+2 пользователь jens написал:
>
> There exist some "intersection" on multi site i
That answers my question. Thanks! Perhaps I'll try to make
matched-vs-updated a point of discussion for Django 2.0. As for the other
stuff, I'll give consideration to work on save_base and maybe work up a
proposal there.
--
Steven
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen
wrote:
> On 26
On Sunday, June 24, 2012 10:31:41 PM UTC+8, Cezar Jenkins wrote:
>
> I'm only lightly involved in the project, but there is some misinformation
> going around about it.
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Daniel Greenfeld
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> We evaluated django-nonrel for use in projects and
Note that I've talked about the issues that nonrel has, and there are many.
That said, I have some responses below. I'm not trying to be the nonrel
spokesperson.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Daniel Greenfeld wrote:
>
> I don't mean to pick bones, but looking at the github account, BETA
> app
On 26 June 2012 22:07, Adam "Cezar" Jenkins wrote:
> I have to agree, that's the big one. Though I the ecosystem of 3rd party
> apps is what makes using Django so great. If there is one ORM for 99% of
> the apps out there, and only one that works Mongo, then the only real use
> case of Django is
On Jun 27, 2012 7:12 AM, "Chris Northwood" wrote:
>
> On 26 June 2012 22:07, Adam "Cezar" Jenkins
wrote:
>
> > I have to agree, that's the big one. Though I the ecosystem of 3rd party
> > apps is what makes using Django so great. If there is one ORM for 99%
of
> > the apps out there, and only on
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Chris Northwood wrote:
>
> Surely that's what it needs though, an 'ORM' and an 'Object-Document
> Mapper' at some point. What's the advantage of trying to shoehorn
> MongoDB to work with an ORM, when it's not relational, and as it has
> to be hidden behind the same
On 06/26/2012 11:07 PM, Adam "Cezar" Jenkins wrote:
Last I heard Jonas wanted to do a new release of mongodb-engine. He might
have meant to say he was not maintaining the project anymore, but he's not
the only one with commit access.
The main thing is that I've lost interest in maintaining this
10 matches
Mail list logo