Re: QuerySet refactoring

2012-06-26 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On 26 kesä, 08:41, Steven Cummings wrote: > Sorry for chiming in so late. I very much like the goals of this effort, > particularly bringing clarity to some of the internal APIs. Some related > points for your consideration: No problem. I have been so busy lately that I haven't gotten a single co

Re: Customizable Serialization check-in

2012-06-26 Thread Tom Christie
> default deserialized_value don't returns anything. It sets the field value. Cool, that's exactly what I meant. > but declaring function only to say "do nothing" isn't good solution for me. Declaring a method to simply 'pass' seems fine to me if you want to override it to do nothing. > It

Re: cache middleware on multi sites...

2012-06-26 Thread sergey
I create my own slightly changed cache middleware (replace get_full_path to build_absolute_uri) http://macrotoma.blogspot.com/2012/06/custom-multisite-caching-on-django.html четверг, 19 ноября 2009 г., 13:16:52 UTC+2 пользователь jens написал: > > There exist some "intersection" on multi site i

Re: QuerySet refactoring

2012-06-26 Thread Steven Cummings
That answers my question. Thanks! Perhaps I'll try to make matched-vs-updated a point of discussion for Django 2.0. As for the other stuff, I'll give consideration to work on save_base and maybe work up a proposal there. -- Steven On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > On 26

Re: Django-nonrel patches

2012-06-26 Thread Daniel Greenfeld
On Sunday, June 24, 2012 10:31:41 PM UTC+8, Cezar Jenkins wrote: > > I'm only lightly involved in the project, but there is some misinformation > going around about it. > > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Daniel Greenfeld > wrote: > >> >> >> We evaluated django-nonrel for use in projects and

Re: Django-nonrel patches

2012-06-26 Thread Adam "Cezar" Jenkins
Note that I've talked about the issues that nonrel has, and there are many. That said, I have some responses below. I'm not trying to be the nonrel spokesperson. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Daniel Greenfeld wrote: > > I don't mean to pick bones, but looking at the github account, BETA > app

Re: Django-nonrel patches

2012-06-26 Thread Chris Northwood
On 26 June 2012 22:07, Adam "Cezar" Jenkins wrote: > I have to agree, that's the big one. Though I the ecosystem of 3rd party > apps is what makes using Django so great. If there is one ORM for  99% of > the apps out there, and only one that works Mongo, then the only real use > case of Django is

Re: Django-nonrel patches

2012-06-26 Thread Luciano Pacheco
On Jun 27, 2012 7:12 AM, "Chris Northwood" wrote: > > On 26 June 2012 22:07, Adam "Cezar" Jenkins wrote: > > > I have to agree, that's the big one. Though I the ecosystem of 3rd party > > apps is what makes using Django so great. If there is one ORM for 99% of > > the apps out there, and only on

Re: Django-nonrel patches

2012-06-26 Thread Adam "Cezar" Jenkins
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Chris Northwood wrote: > > Surely that's what it needs though, an 'ORM' and an 'Object-Document > Mapper' at some point. What's the advantage of trying to shoehorn > MongoDB to work with an ORM, when it's not relational, and as it has > to be hidden behind the same

Re: Django-nonrel patches

2012-06-26 Thread Jonas H.
On 06/26/2012 11:07 PM, Adam "Cezar" Jenkins wrote: Last I heard Jonas wanted to do a new release of mongodb-engine. He might have meant to say he was not maintaining the project anymore, but he's not the only one with commit access. The main thing is that I've lost interest in maintaining this