Re:

фейсик после ipo сильно потерял в цене акций - им нужна комерциализация конче ;) хорошее слово "конче" нам тоже нужно ентое "конче" On Tue 09 Oct 2012 07:28:01 EEST, django-developers@googlegroups.com wrote: Today's Topic Summary Group:

Re: Feature request: collectstatic shouldn't recopy files that already exist in destination

Hi Jeremy, On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 5:15:04 AM UTC+2, jdunck wrote: > > Would it be reasonable to have a backend-specific hook to determine a > fingerprint, where that could be mtime or md5 or whathaveyou as long as > equality (or maybe ordering) works? > Given our discussion in IRC

Re: Feature request: collectstatic shouldn't recopy files that already exist in destination

Hi Stephen, On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 7:28:43 AM UTC+2, Stephen Burrows wrote: > > I'm a little confused by the track the discussion took recently... my > impression was that the solution would *not* be to change from > last_modified to a checksum, or to add an additional checksum method. >

Re: #16630: Support for HTML5 input types

If matters, +1. People can easily change from $('input[type=text]') to $('input[type=text],input[type=email]'), it's a easy, no pain change, with various benefits of HTML5 fields. I would only suggest that people can do something like number_field=IntegerField(html5=False) in form (at least in

A.objects.getdefault

Hi! What do people think of A.objects.getdefault(slug="hello") # returns None if slug doesn't exist A.objects.getdefault(slug="hello", default=A()) # returns empty object if slug doesn't exist I find that in practice, most of the time it would be better to get None back instead of the

Re: A.objects.getdefault

On 9 loka, 17:05, Ole Laursen wrote: > Hi! > > What do people think of > >   A.objects.getdefault(slug="hello")  # returns None if slug doesn't exist >   A.objects.getdefault(slug="hello", default=A())  # returns empty object > if slug doesn't exist > > I find that in practice, most

Re: A.objects.getdefault

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > On 9 loka, 17:05, Ole Laursen wrote: > > Hi! > > > > What do people think of > > > > A.objects.getdefault(slug="hello") # returns None if slug doesn't > exist > >

Re: Pretty Django model instaces updating

I also propose these two little helpers, one is ``refresh()`` and other is ``update()`` https://gist.github.com/3859962 ``update()`` updates instance without calling ``save()`` and calling signals and returns updated instance (sometimes you want to update instance without involving save

Re: A.objects.getdefault

So basically you want: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/querysets/#get-or-create but without the create part - just an empty(), unsaved, object? This existing method is so close to what you want - that I'd be inclined to explore whether it could be modified to do more. In

Re: A.objects.getdefault

Unsurprisingly - this has come up before: Earlier discussion https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/django-developers/Saa5nbzqQ2Q tickets: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17546 https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2659 https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/11352 All the

Re: A.objects.getdefault

For me, get_or_none would prevent a lot of boilerplate code in my views, so I am in favor of adding the method. Wim Op dinsdag 9 oktober 2012 19:15:55 UTC+2 schreef ptone het volgende: > > Unsurprisingly - this has come up before: > > Earlier discussion > >

Re: Redesign of djangoproject.com?

Hi Jacob, I was wondering whether there were any entries and whether a decision has been taken to appoint a benevolent redesigner? Personally I really liked Dana's proposal, marketing-wise, and considering she raised the question, I would certainly support her. My apologies if I missed a

Re: Redesign of djangoproject.com?

Hi Win -- Yes, we selected one of the bids, and we're working with that team to get a new site out. Stay tuned! Jacob On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Wim Feijen wrote: > Hi Jacob, > > I was wondering whether there were any entries and whether a decision has > been taken to

Re: A.objects.getdefault

+1 on a method that returns non upon not finding. We don't need to do: try: val = some_dict.get('key') except KeyError: val = None either. A nget or get_or_none would save me a lot of boilerplate code in my views as well. Tino On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Wim Feijen

Re: Redesign of djangoproject.com?

Glad you like the design, but I'm a he. :) On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 11:58:58 AM UTC-7, Wim Feijen wrote: > > Hi Jacob, > > I was wondering whether there were any entries and whether a decision has > been taken to appoint a benevolent redesigner? > > Personally I really liked Dana's

Re: A.objects.getdefault

On 9 loka, 20:15, ptone wrote: > Unsurprisingly - this has come up before: > > Earlier > discussionhttps://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/django-developers... > >

Re: Redesign of djangoproject.com?

Oops sorry Dana! Thanks Jacob, that's good to hear! Op dinsdag 9 oktober 2012 23:26:42 UTC+2 schreef Dana Woodman het volgende: > > Glad you like the design, but I'm a he. :) > > On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 11:58:58 AM UTC-7, Wim Feijen wrote: >> >> Hi Jacob, >> >> I was wondering whether there

Re: A.objects.getdefault

On 10 October 2012 10:29, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > On 9 loka, 20:15, ptone wrote: >> Unsurprisingly - this has come up before: >> >> Earlier >> discussionhttps://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/django-developers... >> >>

Re: A.objects.getdefault

On 10 loka, 00:49, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > OK, it seems .get_or_none() method is out. I can see the point of that > > decision, there are a lot of similar methods that could be added using > > the convenience argument (like .first() in conjunction > > with .latest()). >