If it were just Hostgator that was the problem, that might be a worthwhile
approach. But that's not the true scope of the problem. We're talking about
every hosting provider in the "$5 per month" hosting category that
currently supports PHP, and provides FCGI as the fastest way they can
support any
Has anyone thought to contact HostGator and see how they would react to
Django dropping FastCGI and/or whether they would be willing to support a
WSGI option.
Regards,
Michael Manfre
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Russell Keith-Magee <
russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Curtis Maloney wrote:
> As much as I recognise FastCGI is pretty much a dead technology in the
> Python world, for people stuck with cPanel sites like HostGator, it still
> appears to be, pretty much, the only option.
>
> And installing uWSGI there is simply not
As much as I recognise FastCGI is pretty much a dead technology in the
Python world, for people stuck with cPanel sites like HostGator, it still
appears to be, pretty much, the only option.
And installing uWSGI there is simply not an option there.
So unless there's a pure python FastCGI -> WSGI l
i start 2 months ago using fcgi inside an shared host (hostgator.com)
and after lots of tries with wsgi only using fcgi was worked with
apache2. but i will read and learn about uwsgi and try this. my app
use version 1.6a of django is 1.6b worked using python 2.6. because
parts of my app is with sta
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some reason, ticket #542 has been collecting spam comments that bypassed
> Trac's antispam. Since receiving spam on django-updates and deleting it
> manually gets tedious after 100 messages, I hacked Trac to prevent furth
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Aymeric Augustin <
aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some reason, ticket #542 has been collecting spam comments that
> bypassed Trac's antispam. Since receiving spam on django-updates and
> deleting it manually gets tedious after 100 mess
Hi,
I'd like to get rid of everything FCGI-specific in Django sooner or later
(rather sooner). Flup isn't maintained since a long time and there is no
ticket tracker to report stuff. Graham pointed out that if someone wants to
use FCGI they can use
http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/O
Hello,
For some reason, ticket #542 has been collecting spam comments that bypassed
Trac's antispam. Since receiving spam on django-updates and deleting it
manually gets tedious after 100 messages, I hacked Trac to prevent further
comments on this ticket.
I'm positive that Trac's antispam work
On 14.07.2013, at 15:16, Jannis Leidel wrote:
>
> On 14.07.2013, at 01:41, Ramiro Morales wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Ticket [1]8713 is tracking removing dependency of Django core on contrib
>> apps code.
>>
>> One of the action items enumerated there is the fact that
>> LiveServerTestCase ma
On 14.07.2013, at 01:41, Ramiro Morales wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Ticket [1]8713 is tracking removing dependency of Django core on contrib
> apps code.
>
> One of the action items enumerated there is the fact that
> LiveServerTestCase makes use of django.contrib.staticfiles' facilities.
> I've open
11 matches
Mail list logo
