Hello Bryce,
Oops! I didn’t realize that conversions were a parameter of the database
connection on MySQL :-( So, yes, it is technically possible to implement the
solution you’re describing.
However I’m not positive that we should make this change. There’s an argument
to be made that database
Hi,
On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 11:59:22 PM UTC+2, Rich Rauenzahn wrote:
>
> This is apparently an expected (and standardized) thing in SQL that ('A',
> 'B', NULL) is unique to ('A', 'B', NULL) as NULL is never equal to another
> NULL.
>
Yes, though the standard goes even further: every
Hello,
In SQL, defining a unique index on a nullable column will only enforce unicity
of non-null values. This behavior seems more useful than allowing exactly one
null value.
Your example adds two more columns to the index. Other than that, it’s the
exact same situation.
In my opinion, the
Well, actually, there is a problem with the check approach: People use proxy
models with user models, to account for different types of users; and it could
be that the actual class is decided before the user is authenticated (because
of different entry URLs, different authentication backends,
Hi,
I work for a very small company that I developed an application for, all
using MS Access (it has back-end MS Access db - although this is planned to
change to some more robust RDBMS, and a front-end app built in MS Access).
Currently this app is used to calculate the exact wages of some
On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 12:51:31 AM UTC-7, Florian Apolloner wrote:
>
>
> I am not against a note in the docs, but I find the fact that nulls are
> not "unique" and can exist in an index more than once very useful (fwiw
> ordering after a column with null can also be interesting across
>
On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 2:16:45 AM UTC-7, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote:
>
> If you really, really want an unique index that allows just a single
> value, you might want to try unique index on (a, b, c) where c is not
> null, and another unique index on (a, b) where c is null. That might
> give
Hi Rich,
> On 29 Apr 2016, at 19:52, Rich Rauenzahn wrote:
>
> I see now that I need to provide a sentinel value -- BOO=True,VAL=,
> or manually create additional unique indexes.
Indeed, you should write a migration with a RunSQL operation that creates a
unique index on
I am writing test cases and have some helper mixins, and when I try to use
some of those mixins in tests that extend LiveServerTestCase, they don't
work properly since LiveServerTestCase never calls setUpTestData. Is it
possible/practical to get this method supported for LiveServerTestCase?
--
Hi,
LiveServerTestCase doesn't inherit from django.test.TestCase intentionally,
that's why it doesn't call setUpTestData().
If you need that functionality just inherit from both:
class MyTestCase(LiveServerTestCase, TestCase):
# ...
Moritz
Am 29.04.2016 um 21:46 schrieb Crono5788:
> I am
Hey,
Thank in advance
I think that once the user has logged in he should not be able to access
the template having the login form w/o getiing logged out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
Django 1.10 adds a "redirect_authenticated_user" parameter for the login
view which, if I understand correctly, accomplishes what you want.
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/auth/default/#django.contrib.auth.views.login
On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 4:40:37 PM UTC-4, rajat vijay
Dear django developers,
I've had to develop a middleware piece for the django website inkscape.org,
the website requires page caching for it's django-cms parts, but was
suffering horribly from over-caching on non-cms pages.
What I want to ask is, is a generic solution to generic class based
13 matches
Mail list logo