+1 for reverting ccc25bf .
On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 19:54, Aymeric Augustin <
aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Commit ccc25bf refers to ticket #23919 in the commit message. In that
> ticket, I argued that the __init__.py files should be kept:
>
Hi all,
I am legally blind. Accessibility discussions tend to largely revolve
around contrast and screen readers (which I do not use) as it’s easy to
measure for (albeit poorly without actually trying to use a screen reader
yourself, which nobody tends to do).
I am unsure if I have any valuable
That makes sense to me. It is a little weird, but it’s the best option.
I will post a comment on the PR. I am happy to update the code if he’s not
available.
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 9:59 PM charettes wrote:
> Taylor, I think that 2. is the way forward.
>
> It looks like the linked PR doesn't
Hi Adam,
> Which checker did you use?
I had a brief check with a few. Firefox's devtools, Lighthouse, and
WebAIM's WAVE browser extension. WAVE is quite nice in that it shows the
problems directly on the page, but they all give more or less the same
information. If Lighthouse can be integrated
Hi Tom
It's a laudable goal to make the admin accessible. Thank you for doing the
research on currently laws and guidelines.
I haven't audited the entire admin, but I have run a checker through some
> pages.
>
Which checker did you use? I see Google's Lighthouse checks for many
accessibility
Hi Ali, as I noted on the PR, the ticket isn't in the review queue because
"needs tests" is checked.
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 9:47:53 AM UTC-4, Ali Vakilzade wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> A while back I opened a pull request on this topic and there is no updates
> on the my request for a while. I know
