Re: Make redirection customizable in ModelAdmin view

On May 4, 10:59 am, Dario Ocles wrote: > Hello everybody. > > Ramiro Morales and me were working on this ticket #15294 [0] and > Julien linked this one #8001 [1]. We had a little discussion about two > possible solution for #8001 and Julien suggested that we should hear >

Make redirection customizable in ModelAdmin view

Hello everybody. Ramiro Morales and me were working on this ticket #15294 [0] and Julien linked this one #8001 [1]. We had a little discussion about two possible solution for #8001 and Julien suggested that we should hear your opinion (you can read all comments on ticket #15294). The discussion

Re: Django urls in JavaScript

Hey Marco, I have forked your library on GitHub and added the management command to build a list of urls and output the file in the format that is specified by django-js-utils. https://github.com/Dimitri-Gnidash/django-js-utils Cheers On Mar 24, 11:37 am, Marco Louro wrote:

Re: Suggestion for improvement to template block/extends tags

Hi Russ. {% decorate (either "a.html" or "b.html") %} This isn't actual syntax; it's just trying to communicate that the subtemplate (not the base), can extend either a.html or b.html. It would be implemented by {% decorate base_template %}, where base_template is a context variable. This is

Re: Ignorable 404s

+1 on both: combine to regex IGNORABLE_URLS, and on empty defaults with commented-out suggestion in generated settings.py As a bonus, the transition for someone who has placed non-default values in IGNORABLE_(STARTS_ENDS) to regexes is near trivial. On Tue, 03 May 2011 23:16:12 +0300,

Ignorable 404s

Hello, Currently, there are two problems with settings.IGNORABLE_404_(STARTS|ENDS): - STARTS + ENDS is too limited: for example, there's no way to exclude icon requests of iOS >= 4.2. A list of regexps would be more flexible. - The default values are fairly arbitrary and prone to

Re: math tag

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Johannes Dollinger wrote: > * __mul__: Display a value of 0.42 as 42%. This would be better implemented as a "percentage" filter, IMO. It would be a natural candidate for inclusion in django.contrib.humanize. -- You received this

Re: math tag

This is a case where there's nothing stopping anyone (as far as I can see) from creating such a tag as an external library. If it garners significant community support and has numerous compelling use cases, then it would be a candidate for inclusion in trunk. If, in developing it, there turn

Re: math tag

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Johannes Dollinger wrote: > > FWIW, here are some concrete use-cases for math in templates: > > * __mul__: Display a value of 0.42 as 42%. > * __neg__/__abs__: Display the absolute value and signum of a number > separately. > * log:

Re: math tag

Am 03.05.2011 um 18:27 schrieb Phui Hock: > Or, in a sane world: > > if x = {{ x }}, y = {{ y }}, {{ x }} + {{ y }} = {{ x_plus_y_res }} > if x = {{ x }}, y = {{ y }}, {{ x }} * {{ y }} = {{ x_star_y_res }} > > and so on. > > While it is a common consensus that logic should never be in the

Re: math tag

> > Or, in a sane world: > > if x = {{ x }}, y = {{ y }}, {{ x }} + {{ y }} = {{ x_plus_y_res }} > if x = {{ x }}, y = {{ y }}, {{ x }} * {{ y }} = {{ x_star_y_res }} > > and so on. > While it is a common consensus that logic should never be in the template, the "solution" on the other hand is

Re: math tag

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Daniel Moisset wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Tom Evans wrote: >> >> From another POV, there is no chance for the designer to screw the >> template up and calculate the wrong value, if he is only allowed

Re: math tag

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Tom Evans wrote: > > From another POV, there is no chance for the designer to screw the > template up and calculate the wrong value, if he is only allowed to > output data. > And the view writer can screw it too, using that logic...

Re: math tag

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Phui Hock wrote: > On May 3, 7:43 am, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> This stems back to the design motivation of Django's template language >> -- you shouldn't be doing math in the template. Instead, you should be >>

Re: math tag

On Tue, 03 May 2011 06:59:02 +0300, Phui Hock wrote: Holy god, not to be rude, but given that this is completely unreadable I'm even more -1 than I ever would have been on the basis of the principle of a dumber template language. Alex My apologies. All that is doing